Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2011
- Posts
- 6,053
N/m
Milan kidnap case: Chloe Ayling was to be 'sold in Middle East'
- Thread starter RavenXXX2
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2009
- Posts
- 4,590
Second row, second person is a "female". if anyone is unable to tell.
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2009
- Posts
- 4,590
That was a jab at anime not the Muslim men involved with the kidnappers wanting real underage girls, after all anime is perfectly legal right?
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2009
- Posts
- 4,590
And that was my retort back, You suggested they should go for that "stuff in my sig" and well, this large gang made up mostly muslim men seem to want that "stuff in my sig".
So how are your tastes much different to theirs? You keep yours to the virtual and print world and if I'm saying they should have stuck to the stuff in your sig then an actual human doesn't get harmed physically?
There's a thread in GD discussing that case you've linked, so maybe just discuss it there if that's the agenda you want to push.
There's a thread in GD discussing that case you've linked, so maybe just discuss it there if that's the agenda you want to push.
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2009
- Posts
- 4,590
Maybe you shouldn't had gone off topic, if you wanted to discuss things like that, you should keep it to the correct topics.
I would rethink what you are suggesting to me, because that is coming over as a legal minefield.
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Jul 2011
- Posts
- 4,418
- Location
- Cambridgeshire
You're kidding.....that's mental. Elbows definitely too pointy
Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
@Ayahuasca @IronWarrior cut it out please.
Having seen a few more details on this in the papers over the last few days all I can say is how has she still not been prosecuted for this?
She's obviously not that bright so why has she not been questioned again by the police? In her first interview she lied and said she never left the house until they said she had been seen buying shoes with him! She then responded by bursting into tears apparently with no explanation.
She has also been seen food shopping with him and sat outside a cafe laughing together with numerous witnesses describing them as looking like a couple.
She's obviously not that bright so why has she not been questioned again by the police? In her first interview she lied and said she never left the house until they said she had been seen buying shoes with him! She then responded by bursting into tears apparently with no explanation.
She has also been seen food shopping with him and sat outside a cafe laughing together with numerous witnesses describing them as looking like a couple.
Considering she is still hot news at the moment, you'd expect there to be photos of her doing anything, especially having lunch with her 'captor'. Paparazzi are stalking her house for goodness sake.
Why would you expect there to be photos of her having lunch with her 'captor'?
I'm not answering obvious questions.
Im not sure that's an obvious question. How many people take their prisoners out for a nibble?
I've obviously misunderstood, not helped with the usage of 'had vs has'. Quite an important distinction so confusion is lessened, regardless should be an easy thing to follow-up via CCTV but even then it's not proof of lies being made, and 'lies' could easily be attributed to stress, what have you.