Soldato
I do wonder how things would be now if the British had stayed in India.
Probably a lot better.
a lot of well travelled Indians that can appreciate the difference between India and the West appreciate this too.
I do wonder how things would be now if the British had stayed in India.
Read my other posts and you'll understand.
But basically, focusing on the perpetrators is only half the solution.
Don't tell me, you want to lay part of the blame on the victims. What next, it takes two to tango?
Read my other posts and you'll understand.
But basically, focusing on the perpetrators is only half the solution.
No, please elaborate.
I'm guessing he means - Where are the girls parents, why is their upbringing so bad that they get to the point that their self-esteem is so low etc etc?
I'm guessing he means - Where are the girls parents, why is their upbringing so bad that they get to the point that their self-esteem is so low etc etc?
Can't read or can't understand?
Whatever the case, I've already said that it's not about blaming the victims.
They're children they are unable to make decisions themselves. What are you getting at?
Afaik most of these girls have been in care, I.e extremely vulnerable, are you suggesting that's a reason they are targeted?
Exactly. The children are vulnerable due to a system that isn't always there to support and protect them. Getting rid of Pakistani Muslim men (extreme example) wouldn't suddenly make the children less vulnerable to other predators.
Idiots may this is victim blaming but it's not.
Or we live in a society which has a significant number of feckless parents who were never fit or socially equipped to bring children into this world. Oops! do you think I'm straying into Sarah Champion territory.
Even though in those council judgements they pretty much ignored Islam and followed tradition.
Pakistan is a failed state, partly owing to corruption, a strong adherence to traditions and culture and a weak and ineffective police force amongst other things. Add Islam to that mix and you've got real problems, particularly since the late 70s onwards following the Iranian Revolution which saw Saudi promote it's salafi doctrine aggressively in response.
I do wonder how things would be now if the British had stayed in India.
They're children they are unable to make decisions themselves. What are you getting at?
Or we live in a society which has a significant number of feckless parents who were never fit or socially equipped to bring children into this world. Oops! do you think I'm straying into Sarah Champion territory.
Probably wouldn't be as much of a dump as it is now tbh, or as dangerous on the boarder with Pakistan. We left at completely the wrong time.
Are you worried about the radicalisation of recently born/unborn children or are you worried about the "Islamisation of Europe"? Or are you suggestion that those imaginary radical 10% out of 8%(aprox. percentage of Muslims in the future) will take over while the rest of the 99% of the population enjoy their tea? Can you make up your mind so we can discuss it properly?
I'm asking you to spell it out. In your own words.Don't think he can help you out more mate
Going to go for one dose of taqiyya here boss. Unless you are not a Muslim ak22? Which I doubt.
History has shown repeatedly that when the Islamic population has reached a certain size (or just plain invades) that it becomes more intolerant. One could argue its already disproportionatly influencing our world when it isn't even 10% and politicians kiss up to it for votes, media treads around sensitively etc..
Nobody is saying it excuses it, the point is that even if you remove every single 'south Asian Muslim man' from the country, you still have a swathe of extremely vulnerable young women and children who should not be left that vulnerable.However many vulnerable girls there are it takes a sick **** to organise and host gang rape sessions. From whatever ethnic or social background.
Vulnerability does not excuse abuse, ever.