Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
^^ I didn't apply any hard pressure at all, same as amigafan2003 did, get each screw to bite and then proceed to torque them down. Same principal to when installing heatsinks etc, saves loads of hassle and cursing.
Voltage does that by default due to XFR. It can go as high as 1.5V. From what I've seen, i don't think it's a gigabyte thing, other boards do it too and yes, it still does it on the F3g bios. I ended up putting in a negative voltage offset to reduce how high it would ramp the voltage up. In the end I just have up and used the p state overclocking to get 4ghz with 1.325v and llc bringing load voltage up to 1.35v. Changing the minimum processor state in power options down to 5% allows it to down clock to idle 2.2GHz too.
Yes definitely not enabled that. I am using a more recent bios version i think, but as i have Raid Nvme now i can only roll back so far and no earlier bios that supports Raid has helped so far.Unfortunately can't have a look until this coming Friday. I believe mine @ completely standard settings scored 163 when I checked it a few weeks back.
One thing that can affect the scores is virtualisation so if you've enabled that at some point it might have an impact.
Pretty sure mine scored 168 at stock. Weirdly, it scores higher (170) when overclocked to 4GHz even though xfr usually pushed single core jobs up to 4-4.2GHz.For guys running stock settings with XFR enabled, can you post your highest Cinebench single threaded score without any cinebench tweaks? I managed to achieve 170-171 months ago, but nowadays on my 1950x the best i can achieve is 158-163 and i can't figure out why i have such a performance drop off. Temps are less than 50c so its not heat related.
Yes that sounds about right, but what i am getting now is too low. Ugh, annoying.Pretty sure mine scored 168 at stock. Weirdly, it scores higher (170) when overclocked to 4GHz even though xfr usually pushed single core jobs up to 4-4.2GHz.
Any chance of a picture of the board in the case as I'm thinking of getting both if it fits.Got mine built and I am really impressed so far it has really cutting down rendering times, I am rendering 4k videos in Premiere Pro in the same amount of time it took the 5820k to render the same video at 1080p, I have it overclocked at 4ghz using the profile in the BIOS and doesnt utilise more than 70% of the CPU during rendering at present, the same graphics card being used (GTX 970) and cooler (Corsair AIO H80i GT v2).
For anyone wondering if the ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 will fit into a Corsair 570x Crystal series case it does just but the right side screws cannot be screwed in due to how the plate is curved but still fits and looks awesome in it, if those screws were in the board would be flexed! The board slightly covers the cable management grommets but there is still space to get all cables through nicely.
I think i tried the different modes, not that. From memory i recall that Cinebench prefers distributed mode.Have you changed memory config NUMA/UMA? that's do it, or if you memory has clocked down and you haven't noticed.
Interesting, maybe I’ll have to retest thanks man.My score of 168 was local mode. I'm yet to find anything that actually prefers distributed. I even get worse bandwidth in aida tests in distributed which makes no sense.
My score of 168 was local mode. I'm yet to find anything that actually prefers distributed. I even get worse bandwidth in aida tests in distributed which makes no sense.
You have to assign the NVMe Boot disk as a Volume on the array and then load the raid drivers when doing the install, or at least that is what worked for me.