Are we going to quantify ‘lots’ and ‘plenty’?
Because otherwise the quoted statements are borderline meaningless/utterly uninteresting.
A scary thought.They'll inherent nothing. All of that money will get spent on residential care as these boomers will live until 120
Yeah, I'd assume plenty do and if more did so then that would only inflate the market further.
Burrow large sums of money in the hope of an inheritance in an undetermined amount of time? yeah, cant see anything wrong with this.
Of course not, young people always get angry at the old people, it's life. One day they walk in those old peoples shoes and realise what the word perspective means, but until then angst and anger is their right of passage. Ever was it thus, ever will it be.
Nope. Rather than rewarding those who work hard, it benefits those born to the ‘right’ parents and who’ve probably already had a head start in life.
If we want a meritocracy and a strong economy in this country then we need to tackle inter-generational wealth rather than encourage it.
What difference would that make?Perhaps one solution is to change the death tax to an actual inheritance tax. Rather than tax the estate of the person that died, tax the inheritance received by each individual as a capital gain.
It is a story. It's another basic story, about LabR@ts basic anger towards the younger generation. Which is ironic, given his 1st post.This is basically a non-story.
Eventually I can see the state pension being done away with. You'll work to 70 and if you don't die on the job you'll be allowed to leave and go back on jobseekers for the rest of your life.A scary thought.
How will the economy work in 2 decades when the largest age demographic has likely retired? Or will it just be that no one retires...
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...es/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/mar2017