So, in your view, judges summaries don't contain any basis for legal decision making!
What palpable nonsense!
Not discriminating is discrimination
- Thread starter SlyReaper
- Start date
So, in your view, judges summaries don't contain any basis for legal decision making!
What palpable nonsense!
You think that people who are not Muslims and Jews getting angry with delays with coroners isn't a thing elsewhere?
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/gravesend/news/grieving-couples-anger-at-death-certificate-delay-180987/
Come on its getting silly now....
Her role under the 'equalities' act to privellege certain mythical, fantastical beliefs over all other considerations?
Despicable illiberal nonsense!
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 36,747
- Location
- Southampton, UK
If you read the story, most of that delay was due to paperwork between the Coroner's Office and a hospital. Totally irrelevant. I think it's my turn to suggest you're getting a bit silly.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 36,747
- Location
- Southampton, UK
I'm not entirely sure how you're misreading my posts and whether that's intentional, but that's not what I said.
But the families of deceased non Muslims and Jews will be disadvantaged, time wise, by this ruling ?
You can't logically argue otherwise!
Last edited:
You said judges summaries were 'most of the time' based on common sense in one post.... then said common sense wasn't the basis for legal decision in another!
What to you think judges summaries contain exactly?
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 36,747
- Location
- Southampton, UK
Disadvantaged by maybe having to wait an extra day or two? It might be that even that can be avoided depending on the complexity of the postmortem.
Let me stop you there. That's not what I said.
If you actually read my post I said that most judges summaries are common sense, that's an end result, not talking about the process of decision making.
The new religion of Caracusism has a central immutable belief that its adherents must quickly be dealt with, by the state, in all matters of law, taxation and assessment or they get permeantly stuck in forum hell for eternity.
We therefore demand that the state most always prioritise the adherents of this religion in all matters of state! (to the obvious time cost of all unbelievers)
We therefore demand that the state most always prioritise the adherents of this religion in all matters of state! (to the obvious time cost of all unbelievers)
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 13,480
- Location
- London
By how long?
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 36,747
- Location
- Southampton, UK
The irony of judges that deal with evidence, facts and proof having to accept the "law" of religious ideologies that don't deal with evidence, facts or proof....
Many non-religious beliefs also are non-evidence based, indeed just as arbitrary. We are human after all.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 36,747
- Location
- Southampton, UK
Like I said, lots of drama llamas in here. This is not a big deal, it never needs to be a big deal.
Is it OK for a person working in a state potion to be just a bit obviously, explicitly racist or sexist in the provision of a good or service just as long as the impact is small?
Its either right or wrong!
Que at the doctors .....
Women..... You must wait one minute before you can approach the desk.... Men come right up!
Would it be OK to ask a jew or a Muslim to similarly wait a minute? And if not why not? After all the impact is small?
The principle is a very big deal.....
And it certainly was a big deal to some Jews and Muslims who were very angry they weren't getting special treatment previously!
Last edited:
took 4 weeks for my wife's friends uncle to be buried recently, she found it quite distressing as she is from a Muslim background and couldn't get her head round the delay (he wasn't), especially as he had terminal cancer for some time so they knew the cause, (Thank you Dr Shipman).
The delay for my Mum was only 10 days but it allowed me to get back in the country, my wife is concerned about members of her family dieing back in Indonesia which came up in conversation due to her friends situation, 14 hr flight no way she will make a funeral there.
I wonder how many people are (unknowingly) buried having been poisoned there?
No post mortem if people are in the ground within 14 hours or so.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 13,480
- Location
- London
So you dont actually know how long non-muslims/jews have to wait orrrrrr?
I understand that your argument is more about the principles behind it, but in this case if the wait happens to be a matter of hours it doesn't really negatively affect others waiting. Or do you think that if stuff like this is allowed to happen it's going to escalate?
The period anyone has to wait depends on many variables some completely out of human control so how exactly could I tell you how long anyone would have to wait in a given scenario?
Heat wave or cold snap? More dead people then normal.... Staff sickness may lead to delays etc.....
What matters is that non Jews and Muslims will necessarily be disadvantaged, time wise, by this ruling. Its not logically possible to argue otherwise!
And I have visited a mortuary and seen post mortems.... Shifting priorities like this would at least lead to some people being delayed in the regions of days not hours as a result of this ruling.
(completing a post mortem is not a quick job)
And on that subject there was a previous disgraceful ruling from our illiberal horrid courts about thoose.... Special provisions for Jews and Muslims there as well
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...n-demands-they-stay-intact-high-10422561.html
Strangely if I don't fancy my relatives being cut up after death I would be told (politely) that I had no choice by the coroner.
Last edited:
Humans are wonderful.