• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD 7nm Vega 20 32GB GPU 3DMark Performance Benchmark Leaked

Wrinkly

Wrinkly

Wrinkly

Permabanned
Joined
31 Aug 2013
Posts
3,364
Location
Scotland
https://wccftech.com/amd-7nm-vega-20-32gb-gpu-3dmark-benchmark-leaked-up-to/

Vega 20 70% Faster Per Clock vs RX Vega 64 Liquid, if the Numbers Aren’t Lying

With that being said, if Vega 20 manages to deliver similar performance to the Vega 64 Liquid at 1GHz we’re looking at no less than 70% faster performance per clock, which seems absolutely bonkers. The alternative hypothesis is that Vega 20 is running at a modest but unknown boost clock speed that 3DMark is just not picking on, although we’ve never seen boost functionality operational on any of AMD’s engineering samples in the past.

The truth most likely lies somewhere in the middle. We’re no doubt looking at a very early silicon here with nowhere near final clock speeds. Vega 20 isn’t expected to begin sampling until the end of the year and won’t hit shelves until next year. So take all of this with a grain of salt in the time being, more will surely come to light in the coming weeks and months.
Click to expand...
 
I didn't think of it as a gaming card, just an example of Vega on 7nm. I'm sure the gaming versions will have 8GB, perhaps even a GDDR6 version.
 
if its still "Vega" and the per clock figures is true then it would likely have to be a massive die with extra CU's which will still be bandwidth staved

I'm going to put it as 3Dmark miss reading the clocks like it always does.
 
We don't know how valid the clock reading is. It is possible that the clock reading is correct and this is the chip at 1GHz.
 
Even if the leak is real,unless HBM2 production has gotten cheaper,this will be very expensive!!

Edit!!

Also,we can't say if the reported clockspeeds are correct.
 
Wrinkly said:
We don't know how valid the clock reading is. It is possible that the clock reading is correct and this is the chip at 1GHz.
Click to expand...


And even if that is the case maybe AMD made a massive chip that can't run faster than 1GHZ.

Clock speed, instructions power clock etc, are all irrelevant. All that you actually care about is instructions power second, and how efficient those instructions are.
 
Haha, the Vegatrain is now recharged! XD

ReuC8Tj.gif
 
So basically assuming the rumour is true and the numbers are accurate, it could be quite fast, once running at a more expected clock speed.

Of course if it is just a clock speed issue and the rest of the numbers are right, then it could end up around similar performance to the currant vega. Which of course is about the same as a 1080 and if you believe these type of rumours, not much better than where the new 1160 is expected to be.

Could be good or bad, but it will certainly be interesting.
 
bru said:
So basically assuming the rumour is true and the numbers are accurate, it could be quite fast, once running at a more expected clock speed.

Of course if it is just a clock speed issue and the rest of the numbers are right, then it could end up around similar performance to the currant vega. Which of course is about the same as a 1080 and if you believe these type of rumours, not much better than where the new 1160 is expected to be.

Could be good or bad, but it will certainly be interesting.
Click to expand...

vega 20 is just Vega 10 with the missing FP64 added back in, and some small refinements.

It is aimed at HPC and wont hit the consumer space.

I don;t see the need for all this speculation. AMD publicly announced all of these some time back.
 
D.P. said:
vega 20 is just Vega 10 with the missing FP64 added back in, and some small refinements.

It is aimed at HPC and wont hit the consumer space.

I don;t see the need for all this speculation. AMD publicly announced all of these some time back.
Click to expand...

Let's face it, speculation is what fuels 90% of this forum :P
 
D.P. said:
vega 20 is just Vega 10 with the missing FP64 added back in, and some small refinements.

It is aimed at HPC and wont hit the consumer space.

I don;t see the need for all this speculation. AMD publicly announced all of these some time back.
Click to expand...

Could you link to AMD's public announcement of Vega 20 please, because I couldn't find one only rumour and speculation.
 
So this chip running at 1000mhz is pushing close to stock 1080ti performance from the graphics score of just over 26k. If it could push high clocks like 1700 it would be some where around Titan V performance.

It does look like some new chip as everything is off. Reads as Generic VGA, 32gb vram, clocks are way off and some other things. I take it the run was verified through the 3dmark database.

Looks promising but loads of salt and hopefully more pop up with similar specs and results.

People are saying it's Vega 20 but it could be anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom