https://news.sky.com/story/designer...-in-future-says-medical-ethics-panel-11439346
Very, very interesting.
Very, very interesting.
What about all the people groaning on about how abortion choice with Down's Syndrome children?
Will they still groan if they can eliminate the disease, but save the child? I wonder how they'll shift the argument, probably into absurdist levels of stupid, much like the Anti-Vax and homeopathic crowd.
in b4 they make it illegal to design a baby that isn't a perfect mix of all races, sexes, etc.
don't see why they shouldn't;'t allow this tbh... allowing people to lower the risk of certain diseases is beneficial to the health service, the economy etc.. and if parents want to make sure say the blue eyed gene they carry is inherited then where is the harm..
I agree with the health point, but I’m not sure about cosmetics. That should be left to nature surely?
That sentence doesn’t make senseWhy? Wasnt it you arguing that pretty people get a lift of advantages/ugly people disadvantages.
Yeah this is pretty bad news. Giving such immense control over the human species to select organisations is a recipe for disaster. Cant imagine humanity in 100-200 years time, humanity will be 100% farmed and enslaved. Can't believe how little foresight people have. Those who have this power will create the best human slaves, and natural humanity will die out. There are some things which should be left to mother nature. Children with genetic problems is sad but people need to realise humanity isn't just about 1 man's child, we are just too emotional, genetic variation is how humanity has gotten to this point.
Good bye natural life. We're now on the brink of branching off into a genetically modified species.
Lift should be a lot.That sentence doesn’t make sense![]()
I suppose it s along term view
1 there's risk of another thalidomide generation thing
2 there's the risk of it opening up a gatica style world of genetically edited elites
I don’t remember that no. I’ve never used the word chads!Lift should be a lot.
You where the one saying in the other thread that good looking people "chads" get all sorts of advantages weren't you?
If that's the case ending ugly is simply another medical condition that hinders people so if you approve medical edits why not cosmetic
Why would you farm human slaves when robots would be cheaper?
As for genetic variation as a species we are very very limited due to our history genetic editing will give us massive variation quickly.
High or low mavity features, high or lower oxygen tolerance etc radiation resistance all things that will be important in our new evnironments
The career of choice then would be divorce lawyer. Could you imagine staying faithful to the same woman for 20 odd years when every other woman who wants you is an absolute stunner!I have read that the Queen doesn't like potatoes. And I am going to ask - is there anything in potatoes that is potentially harmful, so the Queen avoids it?
About beauty - yes - imagine a society of just beautiful people - it would be more pleasant for everyone.
Everyone is looking for a beautiful partner, and the less beautiful have less chances to get a beautiful partner.