Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Over previous generations a lot have waited for and expected the Ti at a reasonable cost. I believe many have skipped the 20 series so far as they want the Ti but it's too much £££. That's a reason I think NV will drop it some time to scoop up more £££££££ from the "Ti" usual buyers. Or they might just accept less sales this gen and hope scoop up more sales next gen. Combined with a Ti shortage I'm fairly confidence they'll drop the price later but as mentioned previously, by that time people then should decide whether to wait for the much better 30 series.Doubtful. There's no reason to. Most people have a budget and if they can't afford the 2080ti will get the 2080 or 2070. Nvidia won't lose many sales with the higher prices, they just force people on to the next GPU down the product stack.
Assuming you don't have something equivalent, just get a £400 Vega 64 (while it's still at that price) and enjoy life! With 7nm Turing/whatever's next, you'll likely see 2080ti performance go for half the current price. No way is the 1 year of ownership worth £1k! As it stands, it's unlikely they'll reduce 2080ti price much in the meantime.
If you think their 7nm is going to be cheaper than this gen I feel you're in for a bit of a shock TBH. Bet the 3xxxti starts a £1500
This kind of business model just isn't sustainable. It should be clear to Nvidia by now that the number of consumers willing to stump up 4-figures for a GPU is not as high as they thought. They've had a taste of defeat with the share price nose dive, and while that was obviously mostly due to the crypto fiasco, they've readily admitted take up on 20xx hasn't been at the level they'd hoped.
They are beyond stupid if they don't take the temperature here and price future GPUs according to what consumers are actually willing to pay, because it's evident beyond a certain point that they simply won't (not in sufficient enough numbers anyway). Performance also doesn't even come in to it really... people only have so much disposable income at the end of the day. A GPU that could max out 4K @ 144Hz without the fans even coming on would be desired by every gamer on the planet... but if it was £5000 the vast majority wouldn't buy it.
If somebody with a mortgage buys a GPU for £1500, it's actually costing them about £2100.
Whilst I agree with your post this is Nvidia we are taking about![]()
That's an over-simplistic view, presumably on the assumption that everyone with a mortgage could have instead paid the money into the mortgage to avoid £600 in interest (?).
This thread is more about whether or not the top end of the GPU market has got carried away and if nVidia has set its pricing too high.
I don't think that could be sanely disputed surely lol!?![]()
I think it can be. The prices are way more than I would pay for the level of performance, but that doesn't mean the pricing is necessarily too high. If they are selling their stock then it is hard to argue that it is too high, especially if production costs/yields are high (increasing sales volume may not necessarily translate to increased profits if outweighed by the drop in marginal profit).
Apple got caught out recently and though they've not exactly slashed the price of their iPhones, they've been making a lot of noise about it. I don't know if Apple will increase carrier subsidies or something in order to make their products easier to pick up on a monthly contract, and maybe nVidia will end up adding sweeteners (which admittedly they are already doing with the included games) in order to maintain the high base price.
Except Apple has competition while NVIDIA doesn't.
I'm definitely not disputing it. Again, it's a bit like the phone market, where one player (Apple) has pushed the prices up rapidly to try and make £1000+ the new norm and they've brought the other big players with them. Luckily, the phone market has plenty of companies willing to make cheap phones with decent specs. Apple keep their prices high, but you can buy something 95% as good as a Samsung S10 or an iPhone XS for half the price. In the GPU market it's not the same. You can buy a carefully-pitched product that knows its place in the performance hierarchy, but you can't really get a bargain.
The only place nvidia has no competition is in the derp pricing category segment, every other tier amd has a competing card that may be a bit slower, a bit faster or on par with the nvidia offering.
AMD has shown that it's content to match equivalent products with an equivalent price. That's not competition, that's two companies putting their products out there and hoping that their marketing strategies will be enough to make customers buy their graphics cards. Real competition would be if the Radeon 7 was £450, since that might well push nVidia into action.