Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 53,766
- Location
- Welling, London
How the **** has this descended into a Trekkie squabble!
TrekkerHow the **** has this descended into a Trekkie squabble!
I didn't say they couldn't be gay. My point was it didn't make sense in the context of the show, it's a military ship and they were ON DUTY. It was blatantly wedged in so the show could virtue signal about how 'progressive' they are.
A couple of other points:
- It's disgusting and I personally don't want to see it. I stopped watching the show. So their virtue signal cost them viewers. Think what you want about that, that's my view. I have previously watched Star Trek my whole life. I looked up to how they all did useful things instead of ripping each other off for money like we do. Totally ruined it for me.
- I believe in the future there won't be homosexuality because it isn't natural and the current fad will have passed. I don't think it's even a remote possibility that what people think is 'progressive' now is still seen as progressive in a few hundred years.
.
I believe in the future there won't be homosexuality because it isn't natural and the current fad will have passed. I don't think it's even a remote possibility that what people think is 'progressive' now is still seen as progressive in a few hundred years.
How the **** has this descended into a Trekkie squabble!
Oh no, farcebook taking responsibility. Shock.
I'm not really sure, not even a huge Trek fan but it was just such an absurd example.
A show with about 100 characters has 2 that are gay? HERP DERP the gays are taking over.
It's not racist to be against white people hurr durr!
I don't care if people call me a crazy conspiracy theorist, it's pretty damn clear these days that the powers that be are trying their hardest to bring down white people any way they can. Only white people are expected to be ashamed of their skin colour and disgusted by their history.
White Nationalism will still exist even if it's not on FB. Just because it'll be hidden doesn't mean it won't exist elsewhere on the web/dark web. Then again, what choice does FB have? If they do nothing they get branded by association.
This all ends down one road, a road where there is only one way of thinking allowed, with everyone who is not in the following hiding their true selves and informers that report them to the enforcement agencies.
There are groups who oppose forced diversity, and instead choose to be proud of their own race's heritage.
I'm concerned those groups are going to get blocked by this.
Leaving only continuing forced diversity, 'positive' discrimination, etc. Which I really don't like.
I'm getting sick of gay, trans, diverse race, characters being injected in movies/tv where it doesn't make sense. E.g. gay male officers kissing on duty in Star Trek.
Who are these powers that be?
And yes, you sound like a loon.
Splitter!Trekker![]()
I believe that in some unevolved species, sex need not be consensual and infanticide has been known to occur so I guess that rape and killing another male's offspring is cool as well?. . . Also considering it happens in all animal species I think that pretty much means it’s a naturally occurring phenomenon.
Yep, forced "diversity" is in everything now it's getting ridiculous, it's so obvious and out of place it's really distracting
I totally understand that, but that mostly just applies to the original series, and now to discovery.Ah the old Trek was better before it got involved in politics or equal rights arguments from some self confessed fans who seemingly are completely unaware of exactly how "progressive" the original series was and how much of a fuss it caused in some circles.
Ah the old Trek was better before it got involved in politics or equal rights arguments from some self confessed fans who seemingly are completely unaware of exactly how "progressive" the original series was and how much of a fuss it caused in some circles.
Mind you I'm not sure how this thread has veered off topic quite so much.