• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

Associate
Joined
6 Jul 2019
Posts
26
Location
The Shire
Oops! I assumed it being an x570 it was expensive. Ignore me then as I haven't looked close at this mobo.

My intuition would say it's fine as long as it has all the features you are looking for. (things like sata ports etc...)

Read some reviews but I'm sure it's adequate. I bought my x370 Prime Pro for about £150 so it was a cheap board and it is still going and I'm planning a 3700x or 3800x upgrade.

Thanks, reviews aren't yet available though I'll take a chance as it's Ryzen 3xxx compatible.
I don't have any user experience of M.2 ssd drives -hopefully I'll choose one that is compatible -
BLUE 3D NAND 500GB M.2 2280 6GBPS SOLID STATE DRIVE (S500G2B0B)
I.e. what is 2280 from M.2 referring to is this compatible with MSI X570 a pro
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Posts
8,393
Thanks, reviews aren't yet available though I'll take a chance as it's Ryzen 3xxx compatible.
I don't have any user experience of M.2 ssd drives -hopefully I'll choose one that is compatible -
BLUE 3D NAND 500GB M.2 2280 6GBPS SOLID STATE DRIVE (S500G2B0B)
I.e. what is 2280 from M.2 referring to is this compatible with MSI X570 a pro

It's compatible. 2280 is the size of the M.2. 2280 is the most common. Having said that, there's an argument for leaving the M.2 slots free for fast NVME M.2s which that particular WD Blue isn't. That one is the same speed as the Sata variant.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Oct 2008
Posts
11,493
Location
Lisburn, Northern Ireland
Both I guess. I'm more curious than anything.

For productivity, then the extra cores on the AMD side will wallop the 9900k

For gaming, anyone buying one of these CPUs won't be gaming at 1080p resolution. Would someone buying a £450-£500 CPU be gaming 1080p? I doubt it, so if they'd be playing on higher resolutions, like 1440 or 4k, then the differences in gaming is marginal at those resolutions given the GPU will be taking more of the workload.

Just my opinion though.
 
OcUK Staff
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2009
Posts
2,572
For productivity, then the extra cores on the AMD side will wallop the 9900k

For gaming, anyone buying one of these CPUs won't be gaming at 1080p resolution. Would someone buying a £450-£500 CPU be gaming 1080p? I doubt it, so if they'd be playing on higher resolutions, like 1440 or 4k, then the differences in gaming is marginal at those resolutions given the GPU will be taking more of the workload.

Just my opinion though.
A lot of people will be getting a £500 cpu for 1080p
 
Back
Top Bottom