Soldato
How you do what?Depends how you do it.
How you do what?Depends how you do it.
The sooner capital punishment is brought back, the better.
Why do you believe that?
Because I believe she doesn't deserve to live after such a heinous crime...bit obvious really.
Do you think she deserves life?
Yes, its obvious that you believe she should die for her crimes, but that is not what I asked... I asked why you believe capital punishment should be brought back.
Yes, I do believe she deserves life... but I don't believe in revenge killings.
Am gonna bring up the point I made earlier, do you agree with your country selling arms to people who use them on civilians?
Even the most heinous of criminals should eventually be eligible* for parole.
*note I said eligible which doesn't mean it should alway be granted.
Subject to the circumstances of the crime and their actions since.
A young person who commits a hideous murder of a child or children in their care is not likely to pose much of a risk 40 old years later under intense supervision conditions and requirements.
What a reacher of a connection. Well done you.As a country, we the UK, the second largest arms dealers of the world... Have sold bombs and guns that have been used to kill children.
I hope that every person in here who is appalled by the killing of these two children are also campaigners against our arms trade, because we provide weapons to those committing horrific war crimes.
Why should they be eligible?
I wasn't tracking this story but yesterday the "model" was sentenced for life for killing her one and three year old children since they got in the way of her sex life. She strangled them both within weeks of one another so she could go and do sordid sex work.
Shocking that a mother could do that to her children but 32 years? (which it won't be). Surely she shouldn't see light of day. [..]
Still, it's an insufficient length of time. Thank you for correcting my mistake, like others did, though.She was, of course, sentenced to life. She was not sentenced to "32 years (which it won't be)"
The 32 years mentioned is the minimum time before which she can apply for parole. So yes, it will be at least those 32 years unless the original sentence is overturned. She might never be released - being allowed to apply for parole doesn't mean it'll be given.
Still, it's an insufficient length of time.
Life, no parole.Is it? What is sufficient iyo?
Life, no parole.
Should be taken from the court, fed a last meal and hanged. Would save the taxpayers millions in keeping it fed and watered inside, no doubt in a cushy unit away from all the other nasty, violent inmates who would like to smear the walls with it's entrails.
She deserves no chance at rehabilitation, and is probably well past that stage anyway. She’s an abhorrent excuse for a human being and should never see the light of day again.Well yes, that's the only answer to that question isn't it. But then you are dismissing any notion of rehabilitation within the justice system and treating it as punitive only.
But if it's anything like the American legal system, it's more costly in legal fees for a death sentence than it is for life time incarceration!
How you do what?