Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 35,711
The majority of YouTube content is rubbish anyway. People will make videos about literally anything to get views.
There’s plenty of royalty free sound and music libraries out there now. There’s no need to infringe any copyrights.
It might fizzle out completely, it might explode an make Google change their ways, only time will tell.
I get that distinction, but I'm not sure it's a big one, given the level of most human interaction.The difference is that we're discussing it
As someone who benefits from shared guitar wisdom, and had never had a moment of tuition from anyone in 30+ years before YouTube, I tend to agree; I just wish it'd been available sooner! Fair use is a nebulous thing though, and algorithms in place to protect the struggling music business aren't respecting the free marketing such videos offer.Having a video demonetised for teaching people how to play a Cream blues riff on guitar is nonsense.
You seems determined to **** off a large number of their content creators. Anything gun related relies third party platforms. And yet some of content that breaks their policies just slips by and is never touched!
The majority of YouTube content is rubbish anyway. People will make videos about literally anything to get views.
Lots of antique weaponry and history channels are suffering too, as YT likes to do things such as ban anything with swastikas in it. Which, sadly, includes perfectly good history documentaries.
The majority of YouTube content is rubbish anyway. People will make videos about literally anything to get views.
Couldn't give a ****, follow the rules or move.
The algorithim is definite more miss than hit but it does throw up some videos definitely worth the views. Like the guy walking through Wales in a straight line for charity.
You clearly haven't seen the videos.Why would anyone want to watch a video of someone walking in a straight line for charity? bonkers.
The algorithim is definite more miss than hit but it does throw up some videos definitely worth the views. Like the guy walking through Wales in a straight line for charity.
Why would anyone want to watch a video of someone walking in a straight line for charity? bonkers.
Lots of antique weaponry and history channels are suffering too, as YT likes to do things such as ban anything with swastikas in it. Which, sadly, includes perfectly good history documentaries.
There's a term " biting the hand that feeds you" YT ers might want to learn
This is mytake.The majority of YouTube content is rubbish anyway. People will make videos about literally anything to get views.
This is mytake.
"Content creators" can be people doing useful stuff like product testing, or it can just be people recording themselves doing stuff.
If you're just recording yourself eating, or playing a game, or... I've never defined that as creating anything.
The creators are the engineers and artists and designers who made the game. The bloke talking crap and squealing into his mike as he reacts to something in the game is not "creating" anything.
Half of these people think they're important and useful to society. Looks like they're getting a dose of reality.
I don't think you even read my post before going on the defensive. Heh.Nonsense. It may seem the content that gets recommended cater to the lowest common denominator but that's simply what the algorithim throws out which is trending, again because Youtube is primiarly watched by a younger audieince. Who else has enough free time to watch it? But look beyond that, there are thousands of channels in the 100k-500k mark that produce quality content that is worth a watch. As always you generalise.