- Joined
- 30 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 12,130
No message.
Last edited:
obviously I am wrong but I thought tax accountability only went back 7 years, which would mean anything pre 2012 I thought would now be irrelevant.
like i say, obviously I am wrong but it is news to me.
I was never involved remotely in anything like these “loan” schemes when I was self-employed, and when I retired in February 2012, my accountant said, “Keep all your books, tax demands and receipts for tax paid, bank statements, cheque stubs, etc. for 7 years, after that you’re home free”, adding, “you probably got away with murder, but you signed a statement that in effect, cleared me of anything that you may have done wrong, as I counselled you to always tell the truth to HMRC.
Go by the rule "if it's too good to be true, it probably isn't" facing tax and you are fine.
I cannot for a single moment believe this guy thought it was legit to be only paying 1/2% tax, he clearly saw it, saw the monetary gain and ploughed on in. Him and others like him are tax dodgers, clear and simple and they should be made to pay up now they've been caught. Either that or they or terminally stupid/ignorant and that isn't a defence either.
I feel that HMRC's draconian response appears to be entirely unreasonable but how anybody could ever have believed that this was an acceptable tax dodge is a mystery to me.
The crooks who dreamt up and encouraged the use of this scheme should certainly be held personally responsible for its consequences.
Thousands got paid net of tax and fees via payment services companies that they were directed to by the agencies that employed them. Typically, about 18% of their pay would be deducted.
Others had no choice because their employers, including many public sector employers, insisted on trust-loan arrangements as a condition of employment.
Obviously this man was assassinated by government elites to prevent him from telling all he knows about the corrupt cabal avoiding tax at our expense. There can be no other explanation.
But sticking people who might not have been in the wrong with a sudden deadline of a few months away for 20 years of something they weren't even aware was an issue strikes me as a bit off. At the very least work with them over a period of time to repay.