Or rather you haven't understood my point.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yet another Intel CPU security vulnerability!
- Thread starter Selekt0r
- Start date
Or rather you haven't understood my point.
Or rather you don’t understand the difference between security breaches now and decades past EOL.
Caporegime
Anyone keeping count of all these?
I’m sure plenty of US lawyers are keeping count.
As I said you've completely misunderstood my point and just assumed some rubbish you think I've said... *yawn*
I can’t understand why you posted what you did.
You aren't even trying.
Problem is I suspect you are reading my post as if expecting it to be a defence of Intel - it isn't.
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 2,773
I'm quite convinced now that Apple will use their own chips for all future macs.
Maybe but I think 7nm AMD parts will be difficult to resist.
Soldato
Intel love a good vulnerability.
so do the amd fanboys. it must keep them up all night in joyful bliss
Why would amd "fanboys" love it? In fact why would anybody love it? I dont see anybody jumping up and down with joy over patching node after node or scheduling downtime. Where all this matters, in the enterprise space, I can assure you nobody is jumping for joy, AMD fan or otherwise.
Amazed they have stuck with Intel, they must be cheap. Intel has to loose market share in the server sector over this, it mush really hurt the big cloud providers.
because amd fans on here post every nuance of anything against intel. the amount of the posts from amd people is obviously very common. the forum is pro amd . just look at the posts.
Soldato
That's because AMD has just released a new range of CPU's. Various threads on all the nuances of new tech. Was probabaly the same when intel had a groundbreaking release............oh wait.....
It is more the pro-AMD crowd tend to be more vocal and quicker to jump on any information that can be slung at Intel and quicker to jump on anyone that might, objective or otherwise, say something that diminished AMD.
Yeah it has been awhile...
Or maybe because this is a tech forum and many of us owe our livelihood to tech and want to see this horrible mess resolved in the best way possible without people like yourself and RRoff telling us how the Intel situation isn’t a big deal and this sort of situation is normal.
I don't really see it the way you do obviously. I think the forum is generally pro consumer and pro value for money. When bulldozer was around nobody was recommending that and nobody was pro AMD. You can't then just claim that the whole forum is now pro AMD when the same people who were recommending 2500/2600k CPU's are now recommending the competition.
You are a *** watch the personal insults *** if you've read my posts and take away from that I'm claiming the situation isn't a big deal.
But then again over all these years like 2-3 others here you only see what you want my posts to say not what I've actually posted.
Last edited by a moderator: