Diane Abbott's son desires Nasher's forum name?

Permabanned
Joined
28 Nov 2003
Posts
10,695
Location
Shropshire
It transpires our potential next Home Secretary and leader of our police force's mature son has been assaulting policemen outside the Foreign Office. He is charged with spitting at police officers and biting one of them in an ugly altercation last Friday. James Abbott-Thompson is now bailed and due to appear in court in February.

Her attempt to legally gag the Daily Telegraph from reporting this failed.

An early private education, something Abbott had railed against was cited as necessary in trying to avoid him mixing with the wrong people and getting involved in gangs if at a poor school. This led her to forego Labour policy and send him to be educated privately in London


Explaining her decisions about his education, she said: ‘I knew what could happen if my son went to the wrong school and got in with the wrong crowd. ‘They are subjected to peer pressure and when that happens it’s very hard for a mother to save her son. Once a black boy is lost to the world of gangs it’s very hard to get them back.

He then went on to study at Cambridge. Sadly what some may call an elitist education has allegedly failed to bring out more than the Hannibal Lecter in him. I'm sure it was done in the best possible taste and with great style though, as befitting our Shadow Home Secretary's offspring... Mss Abbott is now probably (carefully) counting down the days until his trial. Rum old world.
 
Even before this she is an idiot and I do not mean when someone does something stupid you call them an idiot she is actually pure dumb (by my reading on things she has said and done).

oh and also nice to be able say this for a change, she is a racist.

P.S Is Comrade Corbyn the daddy. :p
 
How can you expect this woman to have major influence in running the country when she can't even raise her child properly?

Has anyone raised their children properly in human history?

Seems a rather impressive criticism to put on one lady who tried her best for her son, for him to disappoint her anyway is ultimately down to his own choice. Nor is it a surprise that she would try to defend him as a mother after the fact, as I assume any would.

Additionally, I'd posit that nobody has ran this country properly since 1914, perhaps you haven't noticed but we've been on a rather sad downward trend since then. So really, she's as qualified as anyone else frankly to do so.

A large group of people have taken it upon themselves to attack this person for years because she's an easy target, when realistically the bigger picture is that they're forced to because their own field is filled with the good graces of such luminaries as Grayling, May, Duncan Smith, Rees-Mogg... Best not to target your own camp for fear of realising the truth - that we're run by idiots regardless of creed, so it's really just a sad indictment that this continues to run as a theme, it's easier to swallow that the other side are idiots and shouldn't run the country, but freely admit voting for slightly different idiots with no sense of rationalisation of that position.
 
Last edited:
A large group of people have taken it upon themselves to attack this person for years because she's an easy target
No, they do it because while some stick their heads above the parapet, she is bouncing around on top of it, shouting that you can't shoot her because she's black and that would be racist... while then spouting racist ******** like, "Once a black boy is lost to the world of gangs it’s very hard to get them back".

Best not to target your own camp for fear of realising the truth - that we're run by idiots regardless of creed
I think most people figured that out long ago, which is why voter turnout has dropping in recent decades. It doesn't matter who you vote for, they will be a self-serving **** who screws you over.
 
Back
Top Bottom