Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 13,597
On one part, the headline it said that they would lose their titles but the spokesperson said
"The Sussexes will not use their HRH titles as they are no longer working members of the Royal Family.
"The Sussexes will not use their HRH titles as they are no longer working members of the Royal Family.
On one part, the headline it said that they would lose their titles but the spokesperson said
So according to today’s summit with the Queen, it’s looking likely that both of them will be stripped of their titles. Queen made a statement and called them Harry and Meghan lol.
Does it matter? Its the same thing.
Hopefully, having given everything up - titles, money, property etc - they can now just carry on with the life they've decided on in Canada without any further hassle from the UK. I do wonder what would happen however if in say 3-5 years, they should they divorce - would Harry be welcomed back as a Royal etc as I personally would be against that?
To be honest at the time I wrote that, it was coming from daily mail so I didn’t pay much attention to it as we all know how silly the daily mail and their headlines can be.^^^^ Damn it looks like it is happening*, the papers were right to read into "Harry and Megan" being used by the Queen.
Wonder if they'll still use "Duke and Dutchess" through? Like Harry would then be "his grace" instead of "his royal highness".
Andrews daughters still use HRH without being working Royals, though they just take on individual work/employment privately, I guess this perhaps indicates that Harry and Megan might have their eyes on some larger commercial deals and so can't be seen to cash in on the old "HRH" status.
*Well not quite "stripped" of the titles but not using them.
From what I heard and obviously having 2 brothers out there in Canada, I don’t think the Canadians have an issue with them being there per say but over 75% that we’re polled did say they do not want to pay for their security costs.Looking at Canadian headlines, they don't won't them there either.
I guess they potentially have the option of quitting the commercial stuff once they've made their money and going back to being Royals etc.. when older.
He doesnt want to be a royal.would Harry be welcomed back as a Royal etc as I personally would be against that?
He doesnt want to be a royal.
Not really sure why you dont understand that. He can make money by clicking his fingers.
They're keeping the cottage, but repaying the 2.4 mill the taxpayer spent on doing it up for them.Hopefully, having given everything up - titles, money, property etc - they can now just carry on with the life they've decided on in Canada without any further hassle from the UK. I do wonder what would happen however if in say 3-5 years, they should they divorce - would Harry be welcomed back as a Royal etc as I personally would be against that?
He doesnt want to be a royal.
Not really sure why you dont understand that. He can make money by clicking his fingers.
moreover, the only (punitive ?) deal on offer was one where he had to renounce the title, for whatever (undisclosed?) career they're proposing.He doesnt want to be a royal.
apparently they have a 10million readership, about the same as mirror+sun, so if they all reflect what their readers believe, or now believe,we all know how silly the daily mail and their headlines can be.
What is Harry going to do after all this? He's going to end up a recluse and Meghan will probably dump him.
They're keeping the cottage, but repaying the 2.4 mill the taxpayer spent on doing it up for them.
If the Cottage already belonged to the family then it makes sense they only repay the money they had from the tax payer for doing it up. I don't see where they are going to magic to £2.4m from though. Charity work doesn't pay, so is Harry doing to have to some advertising, or after-dinner speaking (after-all that is where ex-pms make their money).
This seems daft. They will no longer recieve tax payers money when performing royal duties. If that is the case, then surely they should forego all royal duties altogether which I don't think is the case.