10 Downing Street "Senior communications aide" attempts to ban Journalists

englishpremier said:
Aww poor journos getting upset they weren't invited. I bet the journalists that walked out won't be doing so for long. They love these meetings/briefing, it gives them something to write about rather than having to out and come up with something themselves.
Click to expand...

Moley said:
The government can give access to private briefings to whoever they want. Access is a privilege not a right.
Click to expand...

Either you haven't thought this through or you are happy with Russian style Gov where they dictate which press attend meetings. Things are supposed to work like that in a democracy. You don't get to pick and choose and you most certainly shouldn't be granting access to only those that give you favourable reporting.
 
Greebo said:
Three years on and you are still posting the same lies which have been debunked over and over? When will you ever learn?
Click to expand...

Love the revisionism from remainers now that Brexit is actually happening... lots of walking back of the project fear stuff.
 
Roar87 said:
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...obama-brexit-uk-back-of-queue-for-trade-talks

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ole-in-public-finance-if-uk-votes-to-leave-eu

sToP tElLiNg lIeS
Click to expand...

Stop telling lies yourself.

1. We are still at the back of the queue with those that matter if we break the GFA and we need to secure regulatory autonomy, and be able to diverge from the EU’s ‘rulebook’ and be prepared to accept hormone fed beef.
2. You said WW3, your link doesnt match the lie you claimed and have repeatedly claimed for 3 years over and over despite being called out on it every time.
3. We didn't leave the day after Brexit vote so hence no emergency budget needed. How many times does that have to be explained to you?
 
dowie said:
Love the revisionism from remainers now that Brexit is actually happening... lots of walking back of the project fear stuff.
Click to expand...

Everything so far in "project fear" has come true. Its only the bastardised version put forward by leavers which hasnt come true. Or are you going to try and claim about WW3 as well?
 
I remember when I last went to America and barely survived all those yummy hormone fed beef burgers, what a close call that was. And surely if it's merely war in Europe then that's no where near WW3, what an adject liar I am. Oh and we all know the emergency budget is just round the corner! lmao
 
Greebo said:
Stop telling lies yourself.

1. We are still at the back of the queue with those that matter if we break the GFA and we need to secure regulatory autonomy, and be able to diverge from the EU’s ‘rulebook’ and be prepared to accept hormone fed beef.
2. You said WW3, your link doesnt match the lie you claimed and have repeatedly claimed for 3 years over and over despite being called out on it every time.
3. We didn't leave the day after Brexit vote so hence no emergency budget needed. How many times does that have to be explained to you?
Click to expand...

You could say the same to yourself - the UK isn't intending to break the GFA, the WA has been accepted and you seem to have missed that Osborne made his doom and gloom predictions about the vote result... we had that vote result!

Just checked again and the sky didn't fall in.... ;)
 
dowie said:
You could say the same to yourself - the UK isn't intending to break the GFA, the WA has been accepted and you seem to have missed that Osborne made his doom and gloom predictions about the vote result... we had that vote result!

Just checked again and the sky didn't fall in.... ;)
Click to expand...

Again another leaver lie. Nobody on the remain side ever said the sky would fall in ;)
 
Roar87 said:
I remember when I last went to America and barely survived all those yummy hormone fed beef burgers, what a close call that was. And surely if it's merely war in Europe then that's no where near WW3, what an adject liar I am. Oh and we all know the emergency budget is just round the corner! lmao
Click to expand...

You choice to eat that, nothing to do with me or Brexit.

Hey, you said WW3 like you have said 50 times over the last 3 years as you think it makes you look smart and clever as clearly that would be a stupid claim to make. You know WW3 was never claimed which is why you are lying.

Emergency budget wasn;t needed as we didnt leave the day after as Cameron did a runner. Things got adjusted in the next few budgets and BoE did its job.
 
Roar87 said:
I remember when I last went to America and barely survived all those yummy hormone fed beef burgers, what a close call that was. And surely if it's merely war in Europe then that's no where near WW3, what an adject liar I am. Oh and we all know the emergency budget is just round the corner! lmao
Click to expand...

No, you're an illiterate fool, as well as an "adject liar".
 
Greebo said:
You choice to eat that, nothing to do with me or Brexit.

Hey, you said WW3 like you have said 50 times over the last 3 years as you think it makes you look smart and clever as clearly that would be a stupid claim to make. You know WW3 was never claimed which is why you are lying.

Emergency budget wasn;t needed as we didnt leave the day after as Cameron did a runner. Things got adjusted in the next few budgets and BoE did its job.
Click to expand...

We are not at the back of the queue for a trade deal. There has been no war as a result of Brexit , World wide or in Europe. There has been no emergency budget and there will be none. The NHS has been promised the £350m. Good night.

wesimmo said:
No, you're an illiterate fool, as well as an "adject liar".
Click to expand...

I know the word is abject, as in abject poverty, like we would all be if your party of choice were to ever be elected.
 
Roar87 said:
We are not at the back of the queue for a trade deal. There has been no war as a result of Brexit , World wide or in Europe. There has been no emergency budget and there will be none. The NHS has been promised the £350m. Good night.



I know the word is abject, as in abject poverty, like we would all be if your party of choice were to ever be elected.
Click to expand...

Lies lies and more lies. You just have to double down dont you including the £350m per week for the NHS. Our government has promised to spend 4.76bn per year more on NHS. £350m per week is £18bn. Please explain how these two figures can be the same????????

Or have you swallowed the lies and spin and when you have been told that we are spending £18bn more (the £350m per week) on the nhs you didnt notice that was over 5 years not per year?

So whats the other 13bn of the none existant "Brexit bonus" being spent on then?
 
Last edited:
a1ex2001 said:
Nothing because we are currently still paying it! so far we have performed Brexit in name only ie we are out but really still in!
Click to expand...

But but Roar87 (who never lies) has said the NHS is getting the whole £18bn per annum?????????????? You mean he has his "facts" wrong?
 
Chris Wilson said:
Ok, maybe it is, but despite all this pedantry, when someone sees what may be a third generation British man that looks Indian, Japanese or Chinese they describe them as such, and in my experience at least they don't describe them as British, although that may well be what's on their birth certificate and passport. Which is where all this started with wessimo's question of: "What's colour got to do with whether someone looks British?"
Click to expand...

The problem with the above thinking though is it is pretty much the same as the racist "If you are born in a stable it doesn't make you a horse." trope that gets trotted out. Saying someone looks "British" is basically a useless description. It doesn't actually mean anything.
 
RDM said:
The problem with the above thinking though is it is pretty much the same as the racist "If you are born in a stable it doesn't make you a horse." trope that gets trotted out. Saying someone looks "British" is basically a useless description. It doesn't actually mean anything.
Click to expand...

And nobody would ever describe somebody to the police as "Looking British" as it's meaningless
 
VincentHanna said:
And nobody would ever describe somebody to the police as "Looking British" as it's meaningless
Click to expand...

Yes, who would they be looking for? John Steed in a bowler hat? Roger Moore in The Spy Who Loved Me? :p

And just as a reminder, this all kicked off because someone doesn't like looking at "black people" on the BBC website because that's not "what Brits look like".

Rofflay said:
...Look how they use Getty images that always feature black people...
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom