Caporegime
HahaFirst world problems, eh.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
HahaFirst world problems, eh.
Top motherboards for SLI these days are total rubbish.
I got a new Asus Rampage VI Extreme Encore the other day.
The PCI-E slots are 2, 3 or 5 slots apart.
NVidia only make 3 and 4 slot bridges.
This means that the only serious option for NVLink SLI is 3 slots gap which can get quite warm using air coolers on the cards.
Even if I could find a 5 slot bridge it would mean the bottom card covers the on and reset buttons etc on the mobo.
This screw up was brought to us by Asus ROG and NVidia lol.
Nvidia released the best performing cards they had at the time and then refreshed them later when they had better and more refined cards to release. Anything else such as views on them being price/performance "failures" is pure subjectivity. Judging by the overall sales, they were not failures. Also, the Super cards were around 10-15% faster on average, which is perhaps not so significant as to make purchasers of the original cards feel 'too' hard done by. It would still of course be very annoying to some people, though.
The super cards are what we should have got at release but even then it wouldn't have been an amazing uplift.The 2080 was slightly faster than the 1080ti for the same price. Same with the 2070 vs the 1080. At best it can be described bad.
Looking at the steam survey, many people agreed that they weren't great value for money. The 970 is higher on the chart than both the 2070 and 2070 super.
I disagree they didn't sell the best cards at the time they sold what they thought would be the most profitable card.
The super cards are what we should have got at release but even then it wouldn't have been an amazing uplift.
The 2080 even had less VRAM than the 1080ti so costs were saved there also.
Yeah lets not go blowing smoke when its a given the next gen should be in some capacity better otherwise there is no reason to upgrade at all.
I'll be happy with a 10% performance decrease for a 20% price increase.
Nvidia are entitled to charge what they like
+1I'll be happy with a 10% performance decrease for a 20% price increase.
Nvidia are entitled to charge what they like
+1
They are not a charity! Oh and I worked hard for my money, will spend my money on what I want!!
I'll be happy with a 10% performance decrease for a 20% price increase.
Nvidia are entitled to charge what they like
+1
They are not a charity! Oh and I worked hard for my money, will spend my money on what I want!!
Remember, the 2080ti was £1499 so the 3080ti will be £1999 cos that's how it works.
Nvidia are entitled to charge what they like
If they pull another Turing...
Not without critism and people call them out on it.
Nvidia have behaved appallingly and its not ok as much as their marketing and PR dept. want to bury it and there some terrible accomplices in the tech world/media too failure to tell the full picture just means you're an extension of the PR dept