On the flip side, it always makes me laugh when people act as though gaming on a 48"+ TV is a practical solution for PC gamers, when most do their gaming at a desk and don't want to be craning their neck to see what they are playing or don't have the space to put the desk far enough back form a TV to make it practical.
Get a basic understanding of ergonomics, then come back and lets discuss how amazing PC gaming on an OLED TV is for the majority of people.
If living in the likes of a flat in London, then sure, lucky you can even get a PC desk in....
But I'm sure most people if they wanted could make the room to accommodate a 48/55" screen, wall mounting helps a ton.
Much prefer lounging back on a couch from 6+ feet away playing on a big screen than sitting upright at a desk, of course, some games like FPS still just work better when sitting at a desk with a M+K.
I cannot see this being true if comparing to the better monitors tbh.
OLED is also flawed, i would not want to spend over a grand on something that's likely to give me burn in because of a HUD in a game or something.
It's the way motion handling works, OLEDs pixels are self emissive so they allow for literally instant response as in like 0.0000001ms where as LCD pixel response varies from 1-10ms depending on the type of screen i.e. TN being the best and also, when using certain features, which allow for that 1ms response, however, it comes at a cost i.e. severely reduced brightness and other reductions, which hamper the quality of the image. Also, with OLED, the motion is "clear", with LCD, you have this trail, like ghosting especially with VA and dark scene transitions. My 144HZ screen (rated as one of the best for motion) is great when pushing FPS 90+ but as FPS takes a dive so does motion clarity where as with OLED, motion is still pretty flawless no matter what FPS, although because of how good OLED is for pixel response, stuttering is more noticeable (which is why 24fps movies appear stuttery on oled compared to LCD, LCD does a wonderful job of "masking" issues)
I been saying this for years now, only now that more people are picking up the LG 48" are they starting to notice this.
Only thing, which monitors still have over TV is the input lag, although that gap has closed considerably as well now to the point where only "pro" gamers in the likes of CS, COD etc. would notice or/and be hampered by the higher input lag.
Burn in is pretty much non-existent if you are sensible i.e. not using 100% OLED light setting for SDR on a news channel. Have had my E7 since 2017 and it has been used for all types of games, still no sign of any burn in. However, I still wouldn't take the risk for any desktop usage, which is my OLED only gets used for gaming/media and the monitor for everything else or games where M+K work better.
TBF that is its major/only flaw. The big issue is that to get a monitor which in every metric except burn in, is hugely inferior to OLED and it will still cost you two grand. I am fed up seeing £1500+ monitors with awful backlight bleed, inconsistent brightness, black crush, faded colours, poor or useless HDR etc.
And this.