Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What he says about Nvidia pricing and availability will happen, I'm pretty convinced of it.You are late to the party, that BS was already posted.
Try no to miss the AMD Hype Train though, Choo, choo (comes once every few years and always disappoints).
LOL what did you expect, Nvidia to tell you flat out what they're doing? We can gleam info only from second-hand sources who then earn a reputation through their accuracy (or lack thereof).
Makes sense except for the simple fact that Nvidia could have always done that and still they don't yet take over the AIB's business. Why is that?
For Nvidia to sell all of their FE cards in the quantities needed to satisfy the market, worldwide, would be almost impossible. AIB's take away the donkey work while still allowing the cash to roll in.NVidia still need the AIB business as not everyone wants the FE and also the more outlets for their products the more that will get sold.
For Nvidia to sell all of their FE cards in the quantities needed to satisfy the market, worldwide, would be almost impossible. AIB's take away the donkey work while still allowing the cash to roll in.
Nah - 90% of the founders edition cards are assembled by Foxconn who literally do have the facilities to ramp up to world wide production levels if needed.
They literally have small city scale plants for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longhua_Science_and_Technology_Park
(They already make much of the stuff that is put together by the AIBs anyhow).
I don't think you understand all of the logistics involved in a task of that scale, including all of the many things that come after manufacturing.
I'm not even sure why they continue with AIBs at this point
Much better working capital management
Reduced customer support & logistics overheads
Capital management is the big one but still tech companies are mostly moving away from that model - using management companies like Fujitsu, etc. keeping more direct control over their products which is much more an nVidia thing.
EDIT: Really I was talking about the impossibility side anyhow - got a bit distracted there - if nVidia really wanted to do it they have the capabilities it isn't because the scale of it is too big for nVidia - they aren't literally making these cards themselves - their production, logistics, sales. etc. are handled by other companies such as Foxconn and Digital River, etc. who can scale up as needed.
I hope that never happens.
We don't need another Apple.
I hope that never happens.
We don't need another Apple.
They seem to be doing a pretty good job of controlling the GPU marketNvidia can't control the market like Apple... Nvidia after all is just a component supplier..
Nvidia can't control the market like Apple... Nvidia after all is just a component supplier..
I think the current approach is optimal.. but probably someone's got to look at SEC filings..build out both scenarios and check the impact on cash flows..you'd probably also need some time with Nvidia's management because American companies generally don't publish operating metrics...
I am more leaning towards a model where I would rather license the IP than take ownership of chips, QC is the only thing stopping me
nVidia seem quite intent in many ways in following Apple hence some of what I said :s