The whole WSB situation of 'ordinary man' vs investment bankers makes me think of the arrival of building societies to combat the retail banks of the time.
Building societies were very successful, at least in part because they benefitted from a formal structure and a unified strategy. Interestingly, most societies actually became banks further down the line.
The WSB movement suffers because each individual is making decisions at least in part based on individual strategies (or lack thereof). If they created a structure and adopted a single strategy and implemented it, they would be much better placed. Unfortunately, they would then be, to all intents and purposes, an investment bank.
