Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 2,890
- Location
- Exmouth, Devon
I thought it was 4K8K with a different account. DLSS is apparently a graphics detail lowering feature
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
4k mode scalled down by Sony/Nvidia
- Thread starter Sarge2255
- Start date
I thought it was 4K8K with a different account. DLSS is apparently a graphics detail lowering feature
Permabanned
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 6,661
- Location
- Durham
This is the most idiotic thing Ive read in quite some time. The consoles have always done it. Yeah they give you 4k 60fps but a lot of the other settings are low to medium to get this.
You realise you set the graphical effects how you like on PC though? We not talking hold my hand consoles here, you yourself have the ability to tweak PC settings however you want to. You set the resolution and then have a whole host of other settings to tweak HOW YOU WANT TO.
Consoles come with mostly pre set graphical settings. PC you get to do it all yourself you know?
You realise you set the graphical effects how you like on PC though? We not talking hold my hand consoles here, you yourself have the ability to tweak PC settings however you want to. You set the resolution and then have a whole host of other settings to tweak HOW YOU WANT TO.
Consoles come with mostly pre set graphical settings. PC you get to do it all yourself you know?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 6,661
- Location
- Durham
I thought it was 4K8K with a different account. DLSS is apparently a graphics detail lowering feature
I have a 240p Youtube video to prove that though!
The difference is setting console to target 120 fps will alter the settings to hit said target whereas on PC if you just set to 4K 120Hz and settings are too high or game is too demanding you just wont hit 120 fps
On the PC though the person would turn down the settings to achieve 120fps not the PC because we all know console owners are dumb and PC owners are intelligent. (Sarcastic Stereotype warning inserted)
(Please make sure you dont confuse fps with Hz they are not the same albeit interlinked, more like bed partners not saying you are but some other posts seem to be)
Oh geez here we go again, please provide evidence (I know you dont cause you cant) but ill wait anyway
Eh? Setting the refresh rate higher on a pc doesn’t automatically reduce levels of detail. What are you on about.
Of course the consoles have to make compromises. They always have done. They are a fixed specification.
This must be one of the silliest posts I’ve seen in some time.
Of course the consoles have to make compromises. They always have done. They are a fixed specification.
This must be one of the silliest posts I’ve seen in some time.
https://www.pcgamer.com/nvidias-rtx-3080-destroys-amds-rx-6800-xt-in-new-3dmark-test/
AMD 6800xt x 16 performance - 28 to 468fps
There you go buddy. Try googling instead of shouting your mouth off next time
Permabanned
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 6,661
- Location
- Durham
Good increase but given they have gone from poor to better but still not great its not something I would be bragging about if I were AMD. To be fair though they are still impressive gains. As I said though, they would not be half as impressive if they were not so poor in the first place.
I'll give you 28 is poor
I'd have thought 468 was 'fantastic' not just 'better' - it is 16 times higher. Nvidia is 'only' about 9 times higher.
He was at the same thing over in the VR section of the forum. Exactly like you describe, no clue and made up nonsense conspiracies.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2013
- Posts
- 2,159
- Location
- Nottingham
Permabanned
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 6,661
- Location
- Durham
Nvidias is still better though is what I meant. They have gone from Poor to good as you said and the increase is impressive but its taken them from poor to a lot better but still a decent margin away from being a contender
I think he/she is just trolling or really has no idea what he/she is talking about, from the first few posts he/she made when they registered he/she started off with putting people down on their purchases to never going to pay over £500 for a GPU to buying a 3080 to more silly stuff about tech he/she didn't understand or just wanted to troll people that have purchased said items. He/she has more time on his/her hands than an average adult, so i'm also guessing a kid or an adult with the mentality of a kid sadly. Worse forum to do that on here with people that are based in reality of tech and knowledgeable enough. Needs to find a new forum with people on his/her level if he/she doesn't want to learn the reality of said tech.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,222
That's not how it works though. It's the improvement that matters. If you had a game where both performed equally at say 60fps average then enabled this then in theory AMD would see bigger gains and have the advantage. Probably more to it but that's what this was supposed to show.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 6,661
- Location
- Durham
NO its not. The improvement has still taken them to less performance than where Nvidia were from the very start. IF they were both performing the same then thats great except guess what... they were not. I get what you are saying but the point is still they had poor performance and the update has improved it but still doesnt put them on par with nvidia there. Improvement matters thats true but when its so poor in the first place its literally the least you need to do if you are still off the pace after its done.