And JLR.Haven't Renault been doing this for a while? I swear I've seen something like this before.
edit:
Ah just a new provider and more short term.
That's 150 a month in my back pocket
Which doesn't feel like enough to make driving an old Saab 9-5 the smart choice.
Driving 12k miles a year in a Petrol with 300BHP is lunacy.
This feels like an exaggeration as well if I'm honest.
I'm sure there is a middle ground between an old Saab and a Renault Zoe.
To be fair I'm not sure anyone could reasonably expect a brand new car on a scheme like this. Someone rents a car for a month and returns it- 'oh, best send that one to Cazoo and get another one on the fleet'.One thing the Guardian article doesn’t make completely clear is the car you are renting isn’t always a new car. Potentially it’s been well-used by the time you get it. I think they’re under 10K miles at delivery. But there have been lots of people expecting a brand new car (especially on cars with wait lists) and some dented, scratched, 9-month old car turns up for £900 per month and their expectations were clearly not met.
I never said it was the Smart choice. Driving 12k miles a year in a Petrol with 300BHP is lunacy. Would save more with a dirty tractor engine but none the less doing 70 miles commute per day in a Clio sized car with a top speed of 87mph doesn't seem like fun to me. Must be butt clenching trying to overtake a lorry with that top speed.
I really would suggest you test drive one. They don’t have a gearbox as such so the acceleration is incredibly linear and because you are literally always at the power and torque peak, electric cars really do shift. I’d much rather overtake a truck in my electric car than in an ICE car because the acceleration is literally immediate and linear and you don’t have to change gear. It just keeps pulling hard all the way to the top speed.
It different but certainly not worse.
As I say, give one a test drive. I suspect you’ll be very pleasantly surprised.
How is it not worse? I understand you always have peak torque but power isn't constant on a electric motor and it must be quite strained at 87 mph. I can quite easily be doing close to 100 when overtaking a couple of lorries tailgating each other.
Electric cars are fantastic off the line but in the higher speeds ICE is still faster.
Electric cars are fantastic off the line but in the higher speeds ICE is still faster.
Suggest you get off the forums, and go and test drive a Polestar 2, Mustang Mach-E, Tesla (any version), Jaguar i-Pace, Audi E-tron, or even an MG ZS and you'll see how wrong you are. Until you hit rather illegal public highway speeds, overtaking from 55-80 in a decent EV is way better than the vast majority of ICE cars.
I am not talking about those cars.
Electric cars are fantastic off the line but in the higher speeds ICE is still faster.
You literally said, and I quote below.
You genericised all electric cars in your statement.
How is it not worse? I understand you always have peak torque on a electric motor but it must be quite strained at 87 mph. I can quite easily be doing close to 100 when overtaking a couple of lorries tailgating each other.
That’s simply “old car is cheaper than new car”
Thing with EVs is no matter what you do, that battery has a limited life.
they are not exactly a cheap part to replace every (5 years?).