The 10 min -12min mark really helps to describe where we took the wrong step.
After that upto the 20 min mark he talks about all the little things that have lead up to this.
Too many people think you just respawn at A and jump in a tank if there is one tbh. They have no clue what this could escalate into, no one has actually as it would be like something never seen before even if it somehow remained conventional.
He also said, "Cyberattacks can trigger Article 5, but we have never gone into the position where we give a potential adversary the potential of defining exactly when we trigger Article 5"
I'd imagine it'd have to be quite significant for them to jump to that, but not necessarily.
Can we wind down the number of Twitter posts in this thread a bit please, it's getting ridiculous. If I wanted to see the rubbish posted on Twitter, I'd read Twitter.
Logistics could be interesting if Ukrainians can keep on defending, it's one thing to send in tanks etc.. soft-skinned vehicles they'll need for supplies though are far easier to ambush.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.