Absolutely I can take it but it doesn’t change the fact though. Honestly I’ll say it one more time I don’t care what people think of me on a personal level, how can I you don’t know me on a personal level.
I’ll say what I feel and think free of the need to fit in or be popular. People are more than ok with thinking I’m this or that, fill your boots. A few on here are crossing the line but tribalism makes it ok. It is what it is.
Regurgitated opinions from gammon baby news as a response to my post. Brilliant. You realize you are doing exactly what you are accusing everyone else of?Very easy just to repeat what your told as well. Very few original thoughts in this thread.
Some people are definitely very insightful though every cloud has a silver lining.
To me this speaks far more than just regurgitating media rhetoric. But we are all entitled to speak or think how we want too right. To be otherwise is to be more aligned with Putin. The irony.
it’s not Syrians, it’s mainly students legitimately there including female students. Don’t excuse it.
it’s not Syrians, it’s mainly students legitimately there including female students. Don’t excuse it.
Releasing film of captured/surrendered soldiers does not, in and of itself, constitute breaking the Geneva Convention.
prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld" said:“The Geneva Convention indicates that it’s not permitted to photograph and embarrass or humiliate prisoners of war.”
British Prime Minister Tony Blair said:"Parading people in that way is contrary to the Geneva Convention, contrary to all the proper rules of conflict," he told British Forces radio.
"It is forbidden to expose prisoners of war to public curiosity... and the essential thing is to make clear to all parties that PoWs should not be exposed in any form,"
a detaining authority in wartime has a clear obligation not to parade POWs, or allow them to be exposed to the public.
all parties involved in the war had defied the Geneva Convention by allowing pictures of captured prisoners to be aired on television.
Ironic that you're sharing this misinformation in such a post.
I’m extremely disappointed with the likes of Maccies, KFC and Domino’s not pulling out.
If there’s any truth in that, it’s very big.This was probably posted earlier but amazing if true. Even if its not true it might cause a stir in the FSB
Out of everything going on over there why is this the only thing you are focused on?
Not all of them. I’m pretty sure the ones in bigger cities like Moscow and St Petersburg are centrally owned.They're all franchisers aren't they?
It breaks Article 13 of the GC, specifically - https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/ART/375-590017?OpenDocument
This "Public Curiosity" line is what was used by both the United States and the UK when they said that Saddam's filming POW's in 2003 was against the GC - https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/03/pows-m29.html
Those are alongside the Red Cross who also said it violates the GC - https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/icrc-says-pow-images-breach-geneva-convention/3231184
and the Human Rights Watch who also said it did - https://www.hrw.org/legacy/press/2003/03/iraq032403.htm
and it's been widely reported in previous conflicts that filming POW's (by any side) is against the GC - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/25/iraq.martinmcnamara
As an ex-member of the Armed Forces for 22 years who did yearly Geneva Convention briefs, which stated what you can & can not do with POW's, I'm happy with my understanding of the GC. I'm guessing your understanding from the GC briefs you attended (either as a member of the Armed Forces, Civil Servant or maybe as a Lawyer etc) may lead you think otherwise?
Can't agree moreNo one cares dude. Literally no one wants to know if your not tribal or if you know anyone or not on a personal level.
Just stick to the topic.
Yall are acting like a bunch of victims.
it’s not Syrians, it’s mainly students legitimately there including female students. Don’t excuse it.
The Russians aren't calling it a war though, it's a 'special military operation' so they're not PoWs. They're probably lucky the Ukranians aren't labelling them terrorists...It breaks Article 13 of the GC, specifically - https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/ART/375-590017?OpenDocument
This "Public Curiosity" line is what was used by both the United States and the UK when they said that Saddam's filming POW's in 2003 was against the GC - https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/03/pows-m29.html
Those are alongside the Red Cross who also said it violates the GC - https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/icrc-says-pow-images-breach-geneva-convention/3231184
and the Human Rights Watch who also said it did - https://www.hrw.org/legacy/press/2003/03/iraq032403.htm
and it's been widely reported in previous conflicts that filming POW's (by any side) is against the GC - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/25/iraq.martinmcnamara
As an ex-member of the Armed Forces for 22 years who did yearly Geneva Convention briefs, which stated what you can & can not do with POW's, I'm happy with my understanding of the GC. I'm guessing your understanding from the GC briefs you attended (either as a member of the Armed Forces, Civil Servant or maybe as a Lawyer etc) may lead you think otherwise?