Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
According to who? I haven't seen any proof from people who say he's going to Intel.
Take with a pinch of salt. Just saw it on techpowerup forums.
Still better than 'copium'. Either way, the real answer is because AMD makes much more money from CPUs than GPUs. They are higher margin, a better use of fab capacity. Gaming GPUs are pretty low margin in comparison. Even Nvidias balance of effort is switching into enterprise, AI and data centre products, away from gaming GPUs. They are the bottom of the priority list, and especially for AMD when they have 10% marketshare and consumers they have decided they prefer Nvidia.I am not disputing that though
Looks at your original reply, is that what you call a discussion is it? Lol
Tom Peterson was Director of Technical Marketing at Nvidia and was there for 14 years. He left for Intel.
AMD gaining market share now that's a surprise maybe people are now voting with there wallet. I can see them gaining more if they price the 7700xt a bit lower and keep the pressure on the 4070 with the 7800xt. Guess we will see and yea Scott being the boss has to be seen as failing.AMD had over 30% marketshare in GPUs when Herkelman started and now they have 17.5% so the guy was a failure.
Even when Nvidia launched its worse ever GPU lineup with ADA, AMD with RDNA3 only managed to gain 5.5% with 1.7% of that coming from intel and they only took 3.4% off Nvidia.
No he is the head of the graphics business.
Yea i think he second to Lisa.
They should have decimated Nvidia after the launch of ADA though yet 5 in 6 are still buying Nvidia cards which shows they got their strategy completely wrong.
