Greenlizard0 Premier League Football Thread ** spoilers ** [30th Sept - 3rd October 2023]
- Thread starter explicit4u
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 9,606
- Location
- newcastle
That’s just a small selection fella, but the way you scousers act is like the worlds against you
Genuine question are you just trolling or have no self awareness whatsoever?
For a start nobody has claimed these decisions only happen against Liverpool and my god, for you of all people to have the cheek to make these comments when you have not shut up about sky6 bias everytime you have a decision not go your way (usually when you're wrong) or your crazy posts about Richard Masters and the PL being corrupt?
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 9,606
- Location
- newcastle
the Way some posters on here react you would think that it is only against Liverpool (Games to be replayed from the point of the VAR error, and a couple of your own fans are shouting PL corruption, all I posted was a sky sports post showing what the PGMOL had apologised for.
The way YOU post is 100x worse than I can recall from any poster in all the years I've been on this forum. You must remember you wild rants about Richard Masters and the PL and how Mike Ashley was going to take them to the cleaners because they're so corrupt.
You've twice now made trolling comments about how it only happens to Liverpool when nobody has ever claimed that. A massive incident has happened in a high profile match and it is a major talking point and on a discussion forum people will talk about it. You can join in and sensible discuss the issue or you can choose not to but just like your pathetic attempts to troll Utd fans about the Glazers (when guess what, your comments about Ashley were worse than theirs) you're not going to be allowed to troll about this either.
I would happily go to the banter thread but that’s against the rules until this thread is shutI warned somebody yesterday re trolling comments already but I'll put a more general warning here. If people want to discuss the issue sensibly then they're free to do so but anybody that's just going to post petty comments on either side of the debate or going to react to something they don't like with posts that derail the thread then they're going to get thread banned.
It's worth pointing out that the full explanation as to what happened is not an official line from the PGMOL, they've off the record briefed this to journalists. It does raise doubts over the thoroughness of any investigation into what happened when the PGMOL have already publicly concluded that it was a case of human error and have been briefing the press what happened or at least what they claim happened.
I didn't comment on this part of the statement yesterday because it wasn't clear what they were getting at. I half wondered if the guy writing the statement added on for added effect however reading the statement again and the concerns around the way the PGMOL have drawn a conclusion to the situation prior to an investigation taking place I think it's clear that they do not want the PGMOL investigating this behind closed doors.
It's worth pointing out that the full explanation as to what happened is not an official line from the PGMOL, they've off the record briefed this to journalists. It does raise doubts over the thoroughness of any investigation into what happened when the PGMOL have already publicly concluded that it was a case of human error and have been briefing the press what happened or at least what they claim happened.
@BaZ87 it would be nice if you could just edit my post or put a comment against the deletion so it doesn't look like I'm the one trolling.
For my post to be the only one deleted, considering what's been posted on the last few pages, is pretty incredible.
Can we no longer show people for what they are, and instead choose to cover for them?
For my post to be the only one deleted, considering what's been posted on the last few pages, is pretty incredible.
Can we no longer show people for what they are, and instead choose to cover for them?
I wanted to draw a line under any petty arguments and while your post was the only one deleted, I did edit two other posts to remove offending comments. Your post didn't contain anything other than a reply to one of those comments so there was nothing left to leave.
And re your question, you can report any post you're not happy with and a mod will deal with it if needed. Whether here or in any other part of the forum, it only makes things worse when other posters try to take the law into their own hands.
Spurs issue statement after Udogie suffers racist abuse following Liverpool win
Destiny Udogie suffered racist abuse on social media following Tottenham's 2-1 win over Liverpool on Saturday evening
www.football.london
Sadly predictable given the state of social media. While twitter/instagram or wherever these posts were made need to do more, I hope the club are doing whatever they can to find out who were behind these accounts and banning them from every aspect of the club. I suspect even if they can find out who they are, it'll be a 14 year old that never has nor ever will step foot in Anfield.
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 1,691
I suspect the ‘fans’ not only have not attend a Anfield, but also live 500+ miles away and never visited the uk. Very difficult for clubs to do anything, even if twitter/insta ban accounts they will back with a new name within an hour.
Last edited:
I spent 6 months living in Mumbai for work in 2010, and went with some colleagues to the Manchester United cafe there to watch Liverpool v Man Utd. Some of the things the "fans" there were saying were genuinely sickening - racism, homophobia, death threats, Hillsborough jokes, all sorts. I expect that they were using a lot of terms whose meaning and origin was not even clear to them.
To be absolutely clear, I'm not saying that this is a Mumbai problem or an India problem, but in general terms it's nigh on impossible to know where abuse online is coming from. You might think that abuse from people who have never and probably will never see their team playing live would be decreased, but I don't think that's the case
It's being reported that we're going to appeal Jones red card. I don't think there's much chance of them succeeding - while it was harsh and numerous other similar challenges don't result in red cards, it wasn't clearly wrong enough to be overturned.
*no appeal can be made for Jota's as it was 2 yellows.
*no appeal can be made for Jota's as it was 2 yellows.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 41,449
- Location
- Cornwall
No issue with Jones but Jota’s was a farce. Did absolutely nothing wrong for the first yellow and didn’t look like he caught him, despite diving in, for the second. Rules need to change about appealing yellows.
Especially ridiculous when the player fouled was gesturing for a yellow whilst being on a yellow.
Don't forget the 25k fine we've got for 5 yellows and 2 reds 
Edit might be more yellows as we had someone shown a yellow on the bench as well.
Edit2 think it was 7 yellow cards as jota was 2 and a red and whatshisfsce got one on the bench
Edit might be more yellows as we had someone shown a yellow on the bench as well.
Edit2 think it was 7 yellow cards as jota was 2 and a red and whatshisfsce got one on the bench
Last edited:
Jota was stupid to attempt a challenge once he was already booked, even if the first booking was ridiculous.