Mini rant incoming. 
I have a Samsung Jet 75 vacuum cleaner and it is brilliant. Really like everything about it especically how it performs. It is just over 1 year old and the motorised brush head (pretty much in my opinion one of the main components, without it, you can't really clean your carpets) has developed what I class as a premature failure. Nothing to do with normal use and wear. It has leaked what looks like grease/oil on the bottom of the head, it was all gunky. Cleaned it all off (took pictures beforehand) so that I could still at least use it. Contacted Samsung and said please can I have a replacement brush head thing as this one has developed a fault. I explained how the vacuum was practically still new (I think they offer 5 year warranty), how I'd spent ~£500 on this cleaner (extra batteries etc) and could they help me out.
Well, Samsung customer service came back - nope. I quote "...that this falls outside warranty coverage as this falls under the category of routine maintenance". I get the whole maintenance bit, looking after failing batteries, replacing filters, etc. But I wouldn't class a part failure as coming under routine maintenance. So what, every year I'm meant to buy a new motorised head because "maintenance"? I don't agree with that. I did press them again saying as a gesture of good will for the money I've spent can they not help. I can't actually even source a part online! They came back again - no the original reply stands. So it would appear after 1 year of ownership, ~£500 spent, I'm now needing to buy a new vacuum.
I thought well, I could get the Jet 85 (I think is the replacement model), trade in this one for £70 off and possibly be able to use the same batteries. But it is a bitter pill to swallow to give these guys another ~£280 for the new cleaner. Even though I do love it.
Samsung warranty then - rubbish? I thought they would have better QC over something more mainstream like Vax. Urgh.
Thanks for listening. lol.

I have a Samsung Jet 75 vacuum cleaner and it is brilliant. Really like everything about it especically how it performs. It is just over 1 year old and the motorised brush head (pretty much in my opinion one of the main components, without it, you can't really clean your carpets) has developed what I class as a premature failure. Nothing to do with normal use and wear. It has leaked what looks like grease/oil on the bottom of the head, it was all gunky. Cleaned it all off (took pictures beforehand) so that I could still at least use it. Contacted Samsung and said please can I have a replacement brush head thing as this one has developed a fault. I explained how the vacuum was practically still new (I think they offer 5 year warranty), how I'd spent ~£500 on this cleaner (extra batteries etc) and could they help me out.
Well, Samsung customer service came back - nope. I quote "...that this falls outside warranty coverage as this falls under the category of routine maintenance". I get the whole maintenance bit, looking after failing batteries, replacing filters, etc. But I wouldn't class a part failure as coming under routine maintenance. So what, every year I'm meant to buy a new motorised head because "maintenance"? I don't agree with that. I did press them again saying as a gesture of good will for the money I've spent can they not help. I can't actually even source a part online! They came back again - no the original reply stands. So it would appear after 1 year of ownership, ~£500 spent, I'm now needing to buy a new vacuum.
I thought well, I could get the Jet 85 (I think is the replacement model), trade in this one for £70 off and possibly be able to use the same batteries. But it is a bitter pill to swallow to give these guys another ~£280 for the new cleaner. Even though I do love it.
Samsung warranty then - rubbish? I thought they would have better QC over something more mainstream like Vax. Urgh.
Thanks for listening. lol.
