Executed by nitrogen gas

I think it's the companies that make the drugs don't wish to provide them to a state for executions. At least that was my understanding with the cocktail for a lethal injection.
That's what Im questioning though - if they won't supply the traditional cocktail, then why can't they just use widely available general anaesthetics in high doses?
 
That's what Im questioning though - if they won't supply the traditional cocktail, then why can't they just use widely available general anaesthetics in high doses?
General anaesthetic isn’t ‘widely available’ - you can’t just rock up to the anaesthetic shop and buy a truck load.
 
Last edited:
That's what Im questioning though - if they won't supply the traditional cocktail, then why can't they just use widely available general anaesthetics in high doses?
Whenever an establishment like a prison wishes to purchase drugs, they have to state exactly what it will be used for. They have to be honest and admit that it will be used to sedate prisoners for execution. Once the pharma companies read this, the sale ain’t happening.
 
Last edited:
Until he's in more pain than Elizabeth Sennett, the woman he murdered, then I don't care.


I've noticed when these cases are covered in the media, either written or visual, the reporters seem reluctant to state what the person did to get there.

If you murder someone expect to be killed.
 
Thats one of the rare movies that made me tearful. So upsetting, particularly when you know it really happened
Jesus, the green mile is one of those few movies that slaps me, especially that scene. I didn't know it was based on this..... it makes it even more awful. Christ.....

That whole ordeal and the lead up to that execution was equally awful. No lawyer or parents....
 
Last edited:
I find it strange that we care so much as to how humane a death penalty is. Even if it were brutal, they'll be dead shortly anyway. Just make it efficient, easy and the least trauma for the person administering it.
 
This is pathetic honestly. Sorry.

We don’t need to be doing that. Just do it swiftly and get it over with.

None of this inhumane nonsense.

My favourite concept of capital punishment pushers is the eye for an eye mentality. It's circular. The murderer has no right to murder someone, I'm sure we all agree on that. But to let them, and the world know, it's wrong, we murder them. So now the government has done a murder. Do we murder the government?

I just read the BBC article on this guy's execution. Completely inhumane. I accept in the broadest terms that they want to kill this guy, but just ******* kill him. This ******* around with terrible execution solutions is disgusting. You might expect this **** from a Jewish society where an eye for an eye is literally what they're told to do, but this is deeply unchristian, which is the opposite of what most of these capital punishment advocates in the USA claim to be.
 
Last edited:
A more humane method would be a gunshot to the head.... I'm quite sure there are no problems procuring bullets or guns in America and certainly no threat of Americans boycotting gun makers over it.
 
I find it strange that we care so much as to how humane a death penalty is. Even if it were brutal, they'll be dead shortly anyway. Just make it efficient, easy and the least trauma for the person administering it.

Just because the people being executed may have been convicted of being monsters doesn't mean the rest of us want people to go out in an inhumane way.

We're supposed to be better than that, aren't we?
 
Don't really understand this argument. General anaesthetic is easily available. Knock them out then up the dose. Induce a coma then up the dose. Or knock them out with anesthetic then use a method such as the nitrogen gas. There are lots of drugs that would kill a person when the dose was increased.

Same here.
Perhaps the companies refuse on grounds of who is buying the drugs, since I suppose that information must be put forward on the order. Perhaps they just say no to everything they try to order? I don't know.
 
Just thinking a little on this:
1. Proponents of it being painless assume the target takes breaths normally leading to a sudden drop in blood Oxygen preventing the automatic panic response. In a execution the target knows and will attempt to not breath, the result is a slow drop in Oxygen and results in an automatic panic response.

2. The brain “death” in this instance starts cellular death at 2 mins, at 4 mins neuron death starts. This causes misfiring of neurons thus muscular movement.

3. Organs don’t stop immediately, dying through lack of oxygen over the next hour or two.. same with any execution/death
 
That's what Im questioning though - if they won't supply the traditional cocktail, then why can't they just use widely available general anaesthetics in high doses?
Geez, you're right, it's so obvious. You should probably let them know because I think they're ****ing around with nitrogen for no reason, they can just go down to Walmart and buy some Propofol.
 
Same here.
Perhaps the companies refuse on grounds of who is buying the drugs, since I suppose that information must be put forward on the order. Perhaps they just say no to everything they try to order? I don't know.
This information is freely available, perhaps educate yourself rather than idly speculating? Case in point, one of the drugs most commonly used in general anaesthesia is made in Italy and the manufacturer won't export to the US for use in capital punishment.
 
Back
Top Bottom