Stalker 2
- Thread starter Tombstone
- Start date
To be fair, the guy in that who gives it 60/100, says "But if you’re a fan of games like Fallout: New Vegas, or you enjoyed past Stalker games,then this one is worth following up on "
Which seems an odd thing to say, being like Stalker 1 and Fallout New Vegas are only good things imo !
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,961
- Location
- London
As per usual it's almost always a good idea to let these games cook for a couple of patches before picking it up.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,961
- Location
- London
Give it a year to cook
Likewise lol
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,143
- Location
- Blackburn
From my what I've seen over the past 10 mins is game is good unless your used to having your hand held and arse wiped as tends to be the case with modern games but it's very buggy. Though game has been constantly getting small updates over the last few days whilst reviewers have had the game
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,961
- Location
- London
Average review score has dropped from 77 to 72...
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 May 2022
- Posts
- 2,623
- Location
- London
Review embargo was indeed a red flag then 
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,961
- Location
- London
For me it looks like something to pick up next Xmas.
I gave Cyberpunk a year before I played it.
I gave Cyberpunk a year before I played it.
Fine with me, if its in the 70s on there , for some of the reasons that those people have given (I didnt like Stalker 1...well duh, not a surprise that you dont like Stalker 2 Mr Einstein reviewer), then its probably in the 80s for me
Associate
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 2,331
And yet I am hearing the day 1 patch fixes a lot of the issues from early reviewers.
Thats fair, not a surprise really as you've said as much throughout the thread and didnt like the previous Stalker so makes sense that you'd wait a year or so before considering getting it, sensible decision for you.