Would you eat it ? Lab grown meat

Most real animal farming uses stuff not found in home kitchens either. They're fed certain diets (many with process-enhanced crops and additives) and pumped up with various medications, innoculations, hormones and so on.
I think the bigger concern with bio-synthetic meat is that the lack of an immune system means identifying infected batches is much more problematic.
Not true. Routine antibiotic use and hormone enhancers are not used in UK. Antibiotic use is banned in EU. Organic meat forbids both.
 
Not true. Routine antibiotic use and hormone enhancers are not used in UK. Antibiotic use is banned in EU. Organic meat forbids both.
How dae ye stop yer Highland Coos from gettin' sick then, laddie?

They still use innoculations, non-organic feeds, pesticide and herbicide-laden grains, GMO additives and so on, though...?
And a lot of meat sold in supermarkets is still not free-range organic additive-free.
 
They don't ONLY say that:



I thought I would just post the link to the full article so people could read it all rather than post cherry picked paragraphs but it appears the above was missed in favour of selecting the items that fit your argument instead :confused:
The link from the meat association was a green washing exercise, no more no less.

I have never stated that farming does not have an impact. I merely have an issue with people saying that all farming only ever has a negative impact with respect to bio-diversity when its incorrect. Farming has both a negative and positive impact to the countryside.

Precisely. We, as a species, need to realise that allowing farmland to return to its former self is just not feasible, however emotionally pleasing that would be.

We have decimated biodiversity even worse than farming in the name of house building, infrastructure building (roads etc) and all other manner of man-made alterations to the natural UK habitats... Yet it is farming that is, once again, getting the waggly finger and told it is in the wrong.
Farming gets the finger pointed at it because around 70% of the U.K. land mass is used for agriculture and only around 8% is built on.

It’s inconceivable that the 8% that is built on has done more to destroy habitats than the 70% handed over to agriculture.

That’s before considering all the pesticides that historically got sprayed all over the place and all the run off that ends up in the streams and rivers. Don’t get me wrong, the sector is learning and doing better than it ever has but the horse has very much bolted, it then got ran over by a tractor and ploughed into the nearest field so it’s not getting back into the stable.
 
Not true. Routine antibiotic use and hormone enhancers are not used in UK. Antibiotic use is banned in EU. Organic meat forbids both.

Thats just flat out wrong mate.


Its even used on "free range" pig farms, because believe it or not, the overgrown pink, sickly pigs that are forced into gas chambers at 6months old, are not healthy.

Funny you should say that as you have made a few assumptions and put words in my mouth:



I didnt say that farming increased bio-diversity. My POV is it changes the local biodiversity, not necessarily increasing or decreasing it. Farming can create habitats that are more beneficial for certain wildlife at the same time it is less beneficial for other wildlife. Returning the land to non-farmed could mean that the current species die out and are replaced with others.

Biodiversity and farming is not necessarily mutually exclusive. I am not sure if you are seeing vast fields being arable farmed and then deciding this is all farming. To blanket say that ALL farming negatively impacts bio-diversity is wrong and, if I may take a leaf out of your own book given you are "arguing from a position that is fundamentally flawed" - " I'm struggling to see how this is hard to understand"

Oh yea, animal farming is great for the countryside, especially the streams and rivers that get constantly polluted.


"The main pollution causing concern is phosphate. Around 73% comes from nutrients leaching from livestock manure into the river and around 22% is from sewage treatment works."

As for lab grown meat, I think it can only be a good thing for the animals that will not be getting stabbed obviously, and environmental benefits.
 
Last edited:
Oh goodie he's here :D

buddy-the-elf-498-x-263-gif-pfr3nzdkjdquvwxp.gif



Ladies and gentlemen, let the entertainment commence.

Here Johno, I even got you some ultra soft to cry in to this time :D

640x640.jpg
 
The link from the meat association was a green washing exercise, no more no less.

Oh ok... :cry: :cry:

Tell me where they are incorrect and I will look at that but simply foo-fooing a source with a throwaway comment and nothing more will result in my reaction there.

Farming gets the finger pointed at it because around 70% of the U.K. land mass is used for agriculture and only around 8% is built on.

It’s inconceivable that the 8% that is built on has done more to destroy habitats than the 70% handed over to agriculture.

That’s before considering all the pesticides that historically got sprayed all over the place and all the run off that ends up in the streams and rivers. Don’t get me wrong, the sector is learning and doing better than it ever has but the horse has very much bolted, it then got ran over by a tractor and ploughed into the nearest field so it’s not getting back into the stable.

Ah, now you are going above the actual land being changed and bringing on other activities like pesticides that run into rivers and streams, which is a reasonable point.... Can we also therefore mention the vast quantities of sewage, primarily created from activities in said build up areas, being pumped into the same rivers and streams you talk about? Surely that has a massive effect on the wildlife as well.
 
Oh yea, animal farming is great for the countryside, especially the streams and rivers that get constantly polluted.


"The main pollution causing concern is phosphate. Around 73% comes from nutrients leaching from livestock manure into the river and around 22% is from sewage treatment works."

So you choose a singular waterway and base your argument on that?

Oxford University disagrees with you - New study finds that sewage release is worse for rivers than agriculture
 
So you choose a singular waterway and base your argument on that?

Oxford University disagrees with you - New study finds that sewage release is worse for rivers than agriculture

Thats fair, I never claimed animal ag to be the only source of river pollution.

Do you not remember the poisoning of people in devon last year? I lost count the times I opened up the BBC app to see some other river or stream polluted by some dairy farmer.

 
How many streams and rivers does the M1/M6 cross on its route north and are used to drain surface water run off completely with particulates, fuel oil, salts etc from the carriageways without additional treatment?
 
How many streams and rivers does the M1/M6 cross on its route north and are used to drain surface water run off completely with particulates, fuel oil, salts etc from the carriageways without additional treatment?

No idea, transport is pretty essential though, fisting cows so humans can take their milk isnt.
 
Thats just flat out wrong mate.
Nope.

"Organic is currently the only certified system that explicitly limits farm antibiotic use and requires farmers to use other methods to prevent and treat disease, with antibiotics available as a last resort for sick animals."
Routine antibiotics is not permitted under soil association organic status.

From Soil association.

"Currently, the UK has a ban on producing and importing hormone treated beef (and other hormone treated meats) due to public health concerns. "
 
How dae ye stop yer Highland Coos from gettin' sick then, laddie?

They still use innoculations, non-organic feeds, pesticide and herbicide-laden grains, GMO additives and so on, though...?
And a lot of meat sold in supermarkets is still not free-range organic additive-free.
You can use antibiotics if the animal is sick, it's the routine use of if it's sick or not that other countries do that simply doesn't happen here, and isn't permitted under organic status.
There's no hormone treated beef either, that's banned.

Pesticides is a different matter. If you eat organic veg and meat, and the feed for meat is pesticide free.
If not organic, a vegetarian/vegan is eating just as much pesticides as a meat eater, probably more.
 
Last edited:
Thats fair, I never claimed animal ag to be the only source of river pollution.

Do you not remember the poisoning of people in devon last year? I lost count the times I opened up the BBC app to see some other river or stream polluted by some dairy farmer.


Are you actually going to answer the question that the thread asked, or are you just here to push your vegan agenda?
 
Are you actually going to answer the question that the thread asked, or are you just here to push your vegan agenda?

Of course not, and he also actually thinks that he's helping his cause, a bit like JSO protestors but without the balls to do anything other than whine like a little bitch on internet forums :D
 
Are you actually going to answer the question that the thread asked, or are you just here to push your vegan agenda?

Read my post, I did. Maybe ask Diddums the same question with his obvious troll attempt, your bias is showing.

Nope.

"Organic is currently the only certified system that explicitly limits farm antibiotic use and requires farmers to use other methods to prevent and treat disease, with antibiotics available as a last resort for sick animals."
Routine antibiotics is not permitted under soil association organic status.

From Soil association.

"Currently, the UK has a ban on producing and importing hormone treated beef (and other hormone treated meats) due to public health concerns. "


What do you mean "nope"? lol Youre wrong, did you even look at the link provided?

You said this "Routine antibiotic use and hormone enhancers are not used in UK. Antibiotic use is banned in EU"

That is wrong regarding antibiotic use.

How do you think the chickens and pigs that are from factory farms (so most animals) survive long enough to reach the slaughterhouse? ANTI BIOTICS.

 
Last edited:
Pesticides is a different matter. If you eat organic veg and meat, and the feed for meat is pesticide free.
If not organic, a vegetarian/vegan is eating just as much pesticides as a meat eater, probably more.
And what percentages of the market/consumption volume do free-range organic meats occupy versus cack meat?
I expect the nice stuff is in a considerable minority, especially when you include all the catering industries, from takeaway and fast food junk to catering services using the cheapest options for better profit margins.

Bio-synthetic meat may end up being healthier, than the junk level meat at least, by way of not needing all the added crap used in the low-end stuff.
 
Thats just flat out wrong mate.


Its even used on "free range" pig farms, because believe it or not, the overgrown pink, sickly pigs that are forced into gas chambers at 6months old, are not healthy.



Oh yea, animal farming is great for the countryside, especially the streams and rivers that get constantly polluted.


"The main pollution causing concern is phosphate. Around 73% comes from nutrients leaching from livestock manure into the river and around 22% is from sewage treatment works."

As for lab grown meat, I think it can only be a good thing for the animals that will not be getting stabbed obviously, and environmental benefits.

Thats fair, I never claimed animal ag to be the only source of river pollution.

Do you not remember the poisoning of people in devon last year? I lost count the times I opened up the BBC app to see some other river or stream polluted by some dairy farmer.


No idea, transport is pretty essential though, fisting cows so humans can take their milk isnt.


Read my post, I did. Maybe ask Diddums the same question with his obvious troll attempt, your bias is showing.




What do you mean "nope"? lol Youre wrong, did you even look at the link provided?

You said this "Routine antibiotic use and hormone enhancers are not used in UK. Antibiotic use is banned in EU"

That is wrong.

How do you think the chickens and pigs that are from factory farms (so most animals) survive long enough to reach the slaughterhouse? ANTI BIOTICS.


I'd suggest you re-read your own posts mate. You didn't answer the question. I've quoted all of your posts for you, so you don't even need to look for them. As usual, your bias is showing.
 
You said this "Routine antibiotic use and hormone enhancers are not used in UK. Antibiotic use is banned in EU"

That is wrong.
No it isn't.
EU has banned antibiotics.
Hormone treatment is banned in UK.
Cattle in UK are not given routine antibiotics. There may well be some dodgy factory farms misusing them to get around their shoddy hygene, but routine antibiotics are not used across the board. As I've already stated, they're prohibited for organic produce.

Putting you on ignore.
 
Back
Top Bottom