Ah you're half vegan then!I love veg but only with meat![]()

Ah you're half vegan then!I love veg but only with meat![]()
I'm sure they said that before, and companies like Oatly, impossible burger are losing money all over the place because the projected demand doesn't seem to tie with reality.One small point
The vegan food market is projected to triple in 9 years from 2023 to 2032
"The global vegan food market size was USD 33.14 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow from USD 37.37 billion in 2024 to USD 103.00 billion by 2032"
I mean, I get it, stuff shuts down and goes unsold all the time, but it seems that anything vegan is doomed to fail. Why? Are they all filthy unwashed poors who can't afford to eat Lewis Hamilton's fake meat, or are they simply a bunch of whining cretins who are holier-than-thou with their morals but when it comes to putting the cash down, they're nowhere to be seen?
Hmmmm.
Vegetarianism is actually quite easy, you can still eat eggs, milk-based products so getting your macros and nutrients is a lot simpler. I mean a vegan diet CAN work but you have to put more effort into planning, and it ends up costing similar amounts to a normal diet. However from a moral standpoint of not eating animals etc... I get it, and I respect people for that perspective, I'm personally happy with my decision to eat meat.
Ever since learning more about UPF we've become more discerning in how we shop for food etc... can't avoid it totally but I accept that I can minimise it.
not all vegan food is exactly planet friendly either. I think it is too much of a simplification to just assume vegan = saving the planet
lol, were still living rent free in your head I see.
veganism isnt *just* about the climate however i suspect you will find that a lot of people drawn to vegetarianism and a certain amount veganism as well IS because of the environment and as such from those people at least they will pick the meat free products which are more sustainable and still ignore the stuff which isnt.Im not an enviromentalist because veganism isnt about the climate, but iirc its the most impact you can have on the planet with your day to day choices.
Look at the impact of dairy..... shocking amount of land use, water use, emissions and more importantly all the individuals being exploited and killed for their milk.
![]()
Dairy vs. plant-based milk: what are the environmental impacts?
A growing number of people are interested in switching to plant-based alternatives to dairy. But are they better for the environment, and which is best?ourworldindata.org
![]()
If the world adopted a plant-based diet, we would reduce global agricultural land use from 4 to 1 billion hectares
We could reduce the amount of land used for grazing and croplands used to grow animal feed.ourworldindata.org
We're*
i dont pay to watch either...... and i think they are all paid too much at least at the sharp endIts that lack of B12 and Iron getting to their brains
That being said, there are a lot of people who shout very very loudly about their views and morals who, when the chips are down, don't make even a token effort to support those causes.
Think womens sport. The number of people who complain about women not getting paid what they should vs men who have never once in their lives actually gone and paid to watch womens sport is astonishing. Well, I say astonishing, its not, its obvious, but the hypocrisy is ridiculous.
Its easy to be "happy about your decision" when youre not the one being stabbed though mate isnt it.
My daughter and her partner have been vegan for about 9yrs but when pregnant she wanted eggs and fish. Since having the baby she's gone off fish but has kept on with the eggs. Her partner also now will eat an omelette occasionally.Somewhat of an overdramatisation - I get it... you find it horrible.
Using terms like "stabbed" to me is just deliberate emotional hyperbole designed to shock and provoke, rather than trying to engage in a reasoned discussion. You're painting a picture of malicious violence that misrepresents regulated slaughter processes, even if you disagree with the outcome. You also can't dismiss regulation and welfare efforts. There are MANY regulations in place (overseen by bodies like DEFRA and the FSA in the UK) designed to ensure animals are treated humanely within the system, including minimising pain and distress at slaughter. While I know vegans like yourself oppose the system itself, inflammatory language ignores any attempts at welfare within it. I accept that this isn't global, and there is a LOT of inhumane animal slaughter in the world, and I vehemently disagree with it, which is why where possible, I make sure I buy food from good reputable sources.
Attributing human-specific concepts like "murder" (not you but other vegans say it) and "stabbing" to the act of killing animals for food is excessive anthropomorphism. Whilst I agree animals are sentient, applying human specific legal and moral frameworks wholesale is problematic and shuts down discussion about the real ethical complexities, rather than prove the point you're trying to make.
Our omnivorous nature isn't just tradition; it's biology. Humans evolved the capacity to digest and derive nutrients from both plants and animals. This biological reality has shaped cultures and cuisines globally for millennia (in fact we know that humans (before classified as homosapiens) were eating meat over 2m years ago. I accept that this is an "appeal to nature" fallacy which doesn't automatically make it right but it's worth pointing out). While modern society offers choices, acknowledging this biological and historical context is important whether you agree with it or not.
Again you can be healthy as a vegan as you've pointed out if you put the effort in and take the right supplements. That said an omnivorous diet provides easily accessible sources of all essential nutrients, including some that require careful planning on a vegan diet, like Vitamin B12, iron, Vitamin D3, creatine, and readily absorbed zinc. While vegan diets can be nutritionally adequate with planning and supplementation, omnivorism (is that a word?!) offers a straightforward route to nutritional completeness for many.
I don't believe there is a universally agreed ethical framework. A non-vegan might operate from a framework that prioritises human needs and choices, and they may view animals as resources (while potentially (hopefully) still valuing humane treatment), or accepts humans' place in the food chain. Rejecting the specific ethical premises of veganism doesn't automatically make one unethical; it means adhering to a different ethical view, surely you can accept that?
Ultimately, individuals should have the autonomy to choose the diet they feel best nourishes their body and aligns with their cultural background and personal convictions. (Provided it's within legal and sustainable bounds). I think the onus is on everyone to accept people's dietary choices, even if others disagree ethically (or not).
Rather than defending all forms of animal agriculture I agree that omnivores have a duty to follow more ethical omnivore diet. i.e., sourcing meat from high-welfare farms, reducing consumption or mass produced UPF meat sources.
Yes animals still die, but to have the audacity to taint cultural history and tradition because of morality is too much for me, you don't have to agree with it, but you have to accept that there's more to it than just "murder" and "stabbing" of an animal surely?
not meaning to split hairs but that isnt being veganMy daughter and her partner have been vegan for about 9yrs but when pregnant she wanted eggs and fish. Since having the baby she's gone off fish but has kept on with the eggs. Her partner also now will eat an omelette occasionally.
I know but I should have said Veggan.not meaning to split hairs but that isnt being vegan![]()
i just had to google that one...............I know but I should have said Veggan.
i agree saying stabbed is totally wrong.
smashed in the face with a bolt pistol would be more accurateI don't like the thought of how animals are slaughtered.......... but i am a meat eater and don't believe in burying my head in the sand about it either. it isnt a job i would like to do but at the same time i have killed animals myself to eat.
not meaning to split hairs but that isnt being vegan
There was an episode of the royal family years ago which has popped into my head now. (about eating wafer thin ham)
that is my dads argument with my mum.This is why I'm quite fussy about where we buy meat from, the thought of mass produced chicken for example is quite shameful.
If he were a book, he'd be a Mills & Boon book on animal activism.
Somewhat of an overdramatisation - I get it... you find it horrible.
Using terms like "stabbed" to me is just deliberate emotional hyperbole designed to shock and provoke, rather than trying to engage in a reasoned discussion. You're painting a picture of malicious violence that misrepresents regulated slaughter processes, even if you disagree with the outcome. You also can't dismiss regulation and welfare efforts. There are MANY regulations in place (overseen by bodies like DEFRA and the FSA in the UK) designed to ensure animals are treated humanely within the system, including minimising pain and distress at slaughter. While I know vegans like yourself oppose the system itself, inflammatory language ignores any attempts at welfare within it. I accept that this isn't global, and there is a LOT of inhumane animal slaughter in the world, and I vehemently disagree with it, which is why where possible, I make sure I buy food from good reputable sources.
My daughter and her partner have been vegan for about 9yrs but when pregnant she wanted eggs and fish. Since having the baby she's gone off fish but has kept on with the eggs. Her partner also now will eat an omelette occasionally.