yeah, even Witcher 3 was best on OLED
The Witcher 4
- Thread starter Personality+
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 Jul 2010
- Posts
- 3,223
- Location
- Stoke-on-Trent
Wouldn’t get your hopes up too much, it was simply a UE5 tech demo set in The Witcher 4 world.
None of it was gameplay.
It won’t be running like that on base PS5.
Both The Witcher 3 and CP2077 were both downgraded from the show pieces.
None of it was gameplay.
It won’t be running like that on base PS5.
Both The Witcher 3 and CP2077 were both downgraded from the show pieces.
Yup, I vividly remember the E3 demos for both games - looked vastly better than the games at launch.
Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Mar 2010
- Posts
- 11,537
- Location
- Bucks
Because once they start actually building the game instead of a small slice of it, they realise that having 100 characters on screen, a million trees and interactive options everywhere just grinds the engine to a halt.
Its why I made the comment about the Matrix tech demo which is still to this day a mess - Nanite tech is ok but its not the holy grail. it has massive issues with its 'VisBuffer' which has been documented in detail by many developers.
Still good for marketing I guess but CDPR is playing with fire here and seemingly havent learnt much from how they handled Cyberpunk.
Last edited:
Visually it potentially could be impressive but not exactly anything else to really get from this if I'm honest, just the usual fake gameplay complete with person pretending to play.
I do like older Ciri though, I think they've got her look spot on. It will be interesting to see where they can go story/gameplay wise with her.
I do like older Ciri though, I think they've got her look spot on. It will be interesting to see where they can go story/gameplay wise with her.
Yeah, they make demo a masterpiece to draw attention, then release actual game years later with half of the graphics
Yeah they slapped that on after they got people excited though
Never really paid attention to tech demos, most games never really looked like them anyway. Best to wait for actual gameplay before making any kind of judgements.
I just hope they have improved the stuttering UE5 is known for.
I just hope they have improved the stuttering UE5 is known for.
By the time they actually get round to having some semblance of a proper game, it'll be a few years away. They say 2027 as a release date, but after the Cyberpunk 2077 release fiasco they won't release it until it's fully optimized (would they?).
By the time it ready to be released, the PS6 will probably be on the horizon or even released, so it might even be a PS6 game to get all of the bells and whistles.
By the time it ready to be released, the PS6 will probably be on the horizon or even released, so it might even be a PS6 game to get all of the bells and whistles.
That draw 1000 watts through one cable and use DLSS 6.0 with MFG ( x 16 ) .... can't wait2028 at least, we probably gonna have like 7th generation of RTX cards by then
Last edited:
Because first impressions are important. Once hype starts to build for a game and people have already got it in their mind that it's going to be great, it's not often that hype dies down again before launch. CDPR also have the advantage of being one of those studios that a lot of people will defend no matter what. I see a lot of people these days lashing out at anyone who ever criticised Cyberpunk and suggesting that CDPR somehow proved them all wrong by fixing it up. Apparently that excuses the broken mess that people paid full price for at launch, and the fact that they had to wait literal years for it to become a finished product.
