Oh for sure CUDA is utterly dominant and i don't think there is much AMD can do about that and they are trying, ROCm translates a lot of CUDA code and it works well but this is AMD admitting CUDA is everything.Software could also mean software support, as in 3rd party applications that make use of CUDA cores (for example) to accelerate their workloads.
It really is a shame that AMD can't find this performance sooner, like before the reviews are done. I guess these drivers might get used if a site/channel reviews the refresh cards (such as the SUPERs or whatever AMD may have).
This generation more than ever you have to wonder if Nvidia are getting the most out of their cards or if their drivers are just continuously poor and leaving performance on the table on top of the other issues they have.
Although I will admit regardless of which brand I own I don't tend to update drivers once I've found something that seems stable (unless a driver fixes a specific issue I have).
Another mistake they made was with RDNA, (1, 2 and 3) don't have 'Tensor Cores' and what you now have in RDNA 4 are Tensor Cores, those are needed for the kind of DLSS that Nvidia have been doing for years, this is why FSR 4 is such a big leap to catch up with Nvidia, its now the same thing, Tensor Cores were reserved for CDNA (Workstation GPU's)
That changed with RDNA 4 but will more so with UDNA, this is AMD accepting they gone and ******* up with this.
UDNA is the one to lookout for...
Last edited: