VPN options

Status
Not open for further replies.
BUDFORCE said:
Yup they won't care mate, if they've done bare minimum they are good, those certain sites also think the whole thing is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
it's all literally virtue signalling and increasing VPN sales, some MPs are probably on the take being lobbied is my conclusion.

We all know how desperate VPN companies are to try and sell their product ,even though 90% of people had no reason to use them really.

why wouldn't they start lobbying mps and capture a lifetime subscription base.
 
Last edited:
arknor said:
apparently people are getting around the new age verification with stock photos of driving licenses etc from google images or getting AI to fabricate them :D

some people said it helps if you edit the photos so it looks like a hands holding the driving license.

remarkable if true...
Click to expand...
Did exactly that this morning.

For testing purposes you understand. :o
 
Last edited:
Good riddance..

RbBTIn3.png
 
I went to watch Pr0n last night and was like what the heck, and then oh ye I remember this coming clicks USA on Nord VPN fap fap fap fap.
 
Last edited:
arknor said:
it's all literally virtue signalling and increasing VPN sales
Click to expand...
It’s about protecting kids and for that, I’m all for it. You can argue kids will be kids and all the rest of it but that’s not the point, there’s wider reaching impacts.

I’m hopeful this eventually spans to social media, the youth are having their brains rotted away.
 
shifty_uk said:
It’s about protecting kids and for that, I’m all for it. You can argue kids will be kids and all the rest of it but that’s not the point, there’s wider reaching impacts.

I’m hopeful this eventually spans to social media, the youth are having their brains rotted away.
Click to expand...

kids can use a vpn in 2025, complete over reach. UK is up there with north Korea for privacy invasion.
 
shifty_uk said:
It’s about protecting kids and for that, I’m all for it. You can argue kids will be kids and all the rest of it but that’s not the point, there’s wider reaching impacts.
Click to expand...
Personally i would argue kids shouldn't be on the internet without supervision in the first place. Legally speaking they're not old enough to enter into the sort of contract that would be need to access it so if they're using the internet it's with their guardians permission.
 
Murphy said:
Personally i would argue kids shouldn't be on the internet without supervision in the first place. Legally speaking they're not old enough to enter into the sort of contract that would be need to access it so if they're using the internet it's with their guardians permission.
Click to expand...
That argument’s too sensible for GD Murphy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom