Superman: Legacy

This was the reason my friend was suggesting, and thought it makes no sense! Disappointing really. I have no real interest in Peacemaker S2, the brief glimpse of him in Superman was enough for me :)

Edit: 5 measley weeks at the cinema. 35 days.


rp2000
 
Last edited:
This was the reason my friend was suggesting, and thought it makes no sense! Disappointing really. I have no real interest in Peacemaker S2, the brief glimpse of him in Superman was enough for me :)

Edit: 5 measley weeks at the cinema. 35 days.


rp2000
I think its staying at cinemas as well for the time being.
 
A billion dollars!!!!!! :cry:

Didn't even do more than MoS as predicted, surely its time to knock these things on the head for the best part of a decade and just make good tv shows instead.

I think this just proves how hard it is to make a Superman movie, we had Snyder's slightly more "realistic" version, now we've went the more comic book route and they're still not doing the numbers that they want, a billion plus.

Shelving them for a few years might not be a bad thing, since 2008 its been a constant bombardment of them. Its hardly surprising the phrase Superhero fatigue is a thing... Marvel alone have released 37 movies in that time frame, DC its around 15 or so since MOS.
 
Last edited:
Hire or buy or just watched at the cinema again ?
I hired or bought it, I forget which.

Once it's available at home and cinema concurrently the laziness means I'll just watch it at home, I suspect many people may be similar. Yes it's still in the cinemas but the buying and hiring will mean no one will really go to see it on the big screen.


rp2000
 
I hired or bought it, I forget which.

Once it's available at home and cinema concurrently the laziness means I'll just watch it at home, I suspect many people may be similar. Yes it's still in the cinemas but the buying and hiring will mean no one will really go to see it on the big screen.


rp2000
Yea a lot of reviews incoming :D
 
I hired or bought it, I forget which.

Once it's available at home and cinema concurrently the laziness means I'll just watch it at home, I suspect many people may be similar. Yes it's still in the cinemas but the buying and hiring will mean no one will really go to see it on the big screen.


rp2000
It is also possible to have the opposite effect. If people enjoy it they may want to see it on the big cinema screen before it leaves theatres.
 
Better than I was expecting it to be, of the modern Superman films I still prefer MoS, this felt closer to the original Superman films with how the combat played out. Nicholas Hoult was great as Lex Luthor.

I did enjoy that this is more bright and vibrant / colourful compared to most superhero films we usually get and it made it standout, even the heavy CGI scenes you could see what was happening as most scenes are day time rather than hiding it at night.
 
I've just watched it! I'm just going to copy and paste my review here and in the 'what film did you watch last night' thread - makes it easy then.

7/10 easily.
I take back any doubts that I had, this film is it's own thing. IF you can walk into it with that mindset, you'll like it - in the same way The Batman/Joker isn't trying to be The Dark Knight trilogy.

This is very silly, but in a good way, I think by the end of it, the wholesome comedy portrail, is what won me over. It is both it's strength and weakness, I was going to give it 6-6.5/10 but the good outweighs the bad, as there are some weak parts that felt rushed/cheaped out on/could have been better, but overall, you still end up liking it, a lot.

It is clearly meant more for kids and less of the serious/trying to be real/dark/believable style that TDK and MOS/SR portray in their modern renditions of Batman/Superman, but that's completely fine, we can have both - just like we can like TDK and The Batman in their own individual takes.

The cast was surprisingly good, I think that impressed me more how well the actors did, versus what you expect, it just worked casting them in this film. That doesn't go to say these are top tier actors, but they didn't have to be, the silliness of the movies humour throughout, 'just works'.
You're left with a warm humbling wholesome feeling after - something I was not expecting to walk away with.
But I went into it with an open mind.

It just goes to show, that as usual the media stirs up complete ******** about anything they can get their hands on, and makes out it's something that it isn't - I didn't feel any hard pushed woke agenda or any of the nonsense that i've red. Journalists really are pieces of ****, and will make up lies about anything to get paid, clearly.

This was one of the few films I bothered to read up on (because I was initially excited, then worried), and I nearly fell for the rubbish they spouted! Never again.

So TLDR, take it for it's own thing, just like you do with any Batman/Joker movie, despite loving The Dark Knight trilogy.

I still prefer Superman Returns and Man Of Steel, due to the dark and more believable/realistic 'if it was to happen it'd be more like this in reality' Dark Knight-esque style both films had - especially Man Of Steel (being a Nolan), just like I prefer TDK trilogy to The Batman and Joker, but I still love The Batman and Joker in their 'own way', it's just 'at a push if I had to rate one over the other' mentality I'd choose the formers. But so what. Now I have even more versions of something I love, and they're not trying to copy each others style, so I'm all for that!

I'm more than happy to watch more of these if they make sequels.

The dog worked for me, I tried to not look into that part, as many critacised, glad I didn't, it worked.

Also, does anyone else think Rachel Brosnahan, looks the spit of Demi Moore in her prime, in this? Definitely not a bad thing ;)
 
There is much more to come. Supergirl next summer and the next film in the Super-Family has started being written. Possibly Superman 2 or possibly a team up effort with Supergirl.
 
Back
Top Bottom