Project team start losing their mind this afternoon after they see how a rare issue I identified months ago plays out as they start implementing it. Meanwhile I'm like yeah, we know this, we added it in the risks and also copied it as a risk in the implementation document here to further highlight it. And we avoid this issue by doing the next step that we all agreed we needed to take... How do you think this ends? "we need a meeting ASAP to discuss this further". FML.
Hehe. I tend to uncover clangers people have attempted to sweep under the carpet and then have to sort the mess out. For your pleasure:
* Tier 1 mobile operator G-CTO mandates no EOL and software must be supported.. I discover the entire identity and authentication platform is open source EOS/L in about 3 months.. the new version is commercial and the vendor has not even been contacted. Queue convo with the programme 'cio' and I'd sorted this out, including having to sort out a vendor that the third party procurement got so peed off their CEO stopped responding.. eventually I had to arrange a 3rd party to buy the product and support it.. and then get the procurement third party to sign the acceptable commercials with them.. problem solved.
* I've just had a problematical service taken off another department and given to me to sort out. I'm doing due diligence with a A3 piece of paper and a pencilled graph of all the services and their current states of play.. It's just taken me the whole morning and I've uncovered that the service went live and had other services built on it.. but never passed any ITIL service introduction or risk assessment/approval.
A shadowy grim reaper appears and it's a risk analyst.. asks me if I'm accountable for this service.. and I then walk him through the A3 and finding.. he's impressed.. Put together a plan, present to the UK board chief risk officer who stated "I was concerned, but you have it all under control, what do you need?".. and the assigned programme manager takes 9 months to correct the service and the services layered on top for me

Boss comes screaming over after he returned from hols, gave him a 3 sentence update and "oh, carry on then."
* Justifying an organisational restructuring because the fines to the company would be in the region of £800M if there's a mess up.. (surprising how quick I got a "what do you need?" ... well I'd just been telling you...).
Usually execs are in execute mode .. the problem is obviously to difficult to solve lower down the stack.. but sometimes you find people that don't understand.. and you can explain but you need to explain in a way that expedites priority in their language. If in doubt explain in money and fines.. because nobody like being seen to throw away money in fines on a board
