True, but a higher tier of Intel GPU is still welcome for me personally, I've really enjoyed using the Arc B580, having a beefier high end option will be great too. I don't like Nvidia's monopoly in the GPU space and
I can't bring myself to buy an AMD GPU 
, so I probably will pick up a B770 at some point to support competition. and run Bodycam better.
Genuine interest, why?
I don't like Nvidia as a company, all things being equal i will support AMD over Nvidia, not that i think AMD are perfect, for me they have some of the same issues Nvidia have, but they are the lesser of two evils.
Again all things being equal, they aren't always equal, sometimes AMD don't offer what i'm looking for, or their GPU's just aren't competitive, in such cases i absolutely will buy an Nvidia GPU, my last 3 GPU's before my current AMD one have all been Nvidia. my next GPU might be an RTX 5070 Super if it turns out to be what i'm looking for, i'm not going to cut my own nose off to spite the big green monster, i will buy what gets ME the most for my money, its up to AMD to entice me with my money and sometimes they do, i'm happy when they do.
The reason i ask there seems to me this weird tendency with some people who outwardly claim to hate the Nvidia monopoly and yet their attitude and actions seem more comfortable with Nvidia having this monopoly than the idea of AMD challenging that monopoly, i give you Steve Burke (GN) as an example, when he spends his time talking about monopoly's and its not just about Nvidia having one its about how Intel should be challenging AMD's marketshare, not Nvidia and its also not AMD's job to take marketshare from Nvidia, no that's fine and apparently as it should be, his most recent GN news video talked about recent JPR marketshare numbers and on Nvidia's now quoted 96% share he went to some length and detail about how this in inevitable and nothing to be concerned about. Very odd, to me.
And then it comes to Intel's marketshre being 0, now he starts talking about how there is anecdotal evidence that Intel's sales are actually good and that he thinks that Intel are actually taking AMD marketshare, like an obvious hard cope, this is what he wants to see but isn't.
AMD are not going anywhere, they are only going to ramp up their competitiveness, for Intel eventually they are going to have to start charging for their products at a competitive level, the truth is with that they are not going to out do AMD on price to performance and features, its going to cost Intel many more Billions and serval more generations to catch up with AMD and they already have more debt than they are worth.
Tech Jurnoes like Steve Burke created this Nvidia monopoly because their ego responded to Nvidia marketing people paying them a lot of smiley face attention, now they are suckered in by the same marketing team who have moved to Intel, this same marketing team still has the same ego to convince you to overpay for garbage again, the thing that you hate about Nvidia, the people who created that are now at Intel.
Its already working, you're already infantilising Intel.
