Terrible Jaguar re-brand
- Thread starter Stu999
- Start date
For JLR it kinda of is. It's also what it's being referred to as being.
They also didn't insure against cyber attacks lol
Last edited:
Are you always this negative?
We use them at work... They are on the whole ****ing useless so they must at least be very cheap
Who offers cyber attack insurance at a rate that makes sense? Many companies self insure.
Last edited:
Probably seems like it, but as we see it's not cheap in the end...
You get what you pay for
Last edited:
Silver lining and all that.
You seem to have confused concept car with prototype
Do you complain about everything and believe everything was better in the past? It’s the same theme on everything from cars to graphics cards with you.
Must be sad just throwing shade at everything out there.
Even when people reply with valid points you either ignore them, go off on a side mission (as you think people will forget your original point ) or start throwing insults as some defence mechanism.
Last edited:
So you would rather see JLR fold, and much of the supply chain, at the cost of 100k jobs. Rather than the Government give, what is otherwise, a profitable company a loan to help them through an exceptional circumstance?
What a weird take. You better never look up what the Insolvency Service does then else you’ll probably have an aneurysm.
It was at Goodwood FOS
I don’t know about the revival, as I didn’t go this year, but that’s for classic cars so I wouldn’t expect it there anyway.
Last edited:
So you would rather see JLR fold, and much of the supply chain, at the cost of 100k jobs. Rather than the Government give, what is otherwise, a profitable company a loan to help them through an exceptional circumstance?
What a weird take. You better never look up what the Insolvency Service does then else you’ll probably have an aneurysm.
It was at Goodwood FOS
If they are as profitable as they say, they can cover it themselves and take the hit. They claimed they made 2.5bn in profit last year.
Like the water companies, it's a mess of their own making. We shouldn't be paying for it.
Last edited:
…And we aren’t. (Assuming you actually pay tax)
Associate
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2020
- Posts
- 217
- Location
- Close enough to OcUK that my wallet hurts
Private Eye reported the TCS link a couple of weeks ago, and added that an 'Internal Review' had found no issues, so that's alright then.
For anyone in any doubt, as a freelance software writer I came across many businesses, in many sectors, that regretted outsourcing to India, even via major names like Oracle.
Working with them is impossible, as they repeat the same mistakes time and time again and the quality is so low that you have to rewrite anything. At one place (no names, no pack drill) they even had their own 'branches' India, and they refused to use the operators out there.
For anyone in any doubt, as a freelance software writer I came across many businesses, in many sectors, that regretted outsourcing to India, even via major names like Oracle.
Working with them is impossible, as they repeat the same mistakes time and time again and the quality is so low that you have to rewrite anything. At one place (no names, no pack drill) they even had their own 'branches' India, and they refused to use the operators out there.
Goodwood FOS
Why does it look like a render? Genuinely thought I was looking at renders until I saw the spectators taking pics.
It's odd isn't it. A bit like that BMW Vantablack too, seems to be a new paint technique or something.
Yep it's literally designed to absorb light and reflect nothing. If it doesn't get hit while parked, your getting T-boned. Stupid idea on a car.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,282
To be fair, so is matte paint unless you want to wash your car almost everyday
Though at least that isn't a safety risk.