Shillup said the first few hours are shiite but then it vastly improves
007 First Light
- Thread starter chrismscotland
- Start date
Shillup said the first few hours are shiite but then it vastly improves
Modded MFG works btw too, x6 available on RTX 40 series. ON my 4090 using anything above 4x at 4K output results in a lower baseline fps, around 40fps base at 6x MFG - This is less efficient than DLSS MFG obviously as the mod uses FSR 4.1's MFG system, but 4x works more than fine with only a slight panning motion judder to game world highlights if you are sensitive to such things.
Dynamic is available too. No other obvious artefacting in the limited testing I did before dropping back to DLSS FG 2x which is perfect and gets over 200fps if fps is uncapped on a 4090.
For me in this game, 100fps cap + Ultra everything + 4K DLSS Balanced with 2x FG = Quiet running 4090 so can game peacefully
Which leaves lots of headroom for path tracing using DLSS Performance.
Time to get yourself the master race gpu family!
AMDs frame gen still has a long way to go.
Such a great tech MFG though, usually x3 is plenty with dlss balanced/performance to get locked to 225 on a 240hz monitor so had no real need to go to x5 and above. x4 is very good for the path tracing games though like RE and pragmata and I suspect this game when it gets PT.
Time to get yourself the master race gpu family!
AMDs frame gen still has a long way to go.
Such a great tech MFG though, usually x3 is plenty with dlss balanced/performance to get locked to 225 on a 240hz monitor so had no real need to go to x5 and above. x4 is very good for the path tracing games though like RE and pragmata and I suspect this game when it gets PT.
Poor thing, stuck on having to go out of his way to use an inferior version.
I always knew he would like and want the tech. But he wasn't having it. As I have always said, stubborn
Last edited:
There are dozens of us! Dozens I say!
Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 26,649
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
I have a 5090. and a 3090 sitting and being used as a door stopper at the moment
Poor thing, stuck on having to go out of his way to use an inferior version.
I always knew he would like and want the tech. But he wasn't having it. As I have always said, stubborn
Modded MFG works btw too, x6 available on RTX 40 series. ON my 4090 using anything above 4x at 4K output results in a lower baseline fps, around 40fps base at 6x MFG - This is less efficient than DLSS MFG obviously as the mod uses FSR 4.1's MFG system, but 4x works more than fine with only a slight panning motion judder to game world highlights if you are sensitive to such things.
Dynamic is available too. No other obvious artefacting in the limited testing I did before dropping back to DLSS FG 2x which is perfect and gets over 200fps if fps is uncapped on a 4090.
For me in this game, 100fps cap + Ultra everything + 4K DLSS Balanced with 2x FG = Quiet running 4090 so can game peacefully
Which leaves lots of headroom for path tracing using DLSS Performance.
Even HUB are now starting to come round and praise MFG
Timmy be loving it now he has a high hz monitor and finally sees the true benefit of MFG/high fps. WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE!
Last edited:
Even HUB are now starting to come round and praise MFG
Give it couple.of years, once AMD boys get access to it, they will suddenly change their tune too
But mrk in particular was chef's kiss
Give it couple.of years, once AMD boys get access to it, they will suddenly change their tune too
But mrk in particular was chef's kiss
The future was foretold many years ago, many prophecies have come true. Even got timmy stating this now too. It is truly a great time to be alive!
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 2,728
It's a 15-20 hour game, if that helps make your decision for you.
For the visuals I'd be picking PC, but to be honest playing it on a tv is a better experience if that's the scenario you find yourself deciding on TV/Monitor. I use both with a PC and TV experience is much cooler.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,870
I don't know why people don't connect their PCs to their TVs more often
Been doing it for well over a decade.
Been doing it for well over a decade.
Because among the various Internet communities in various places, a couch and TV is exclusive to consoles, there’s absolutely no way a PC can ever work in that scenario
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 2,728
Yeah immersion for specific genres is much much better. The exact sort of game you want to enjoy on your TV also, especially with many of the big action set pieces the game offers, if you have the choice of course.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Sep 2016
- Posts
- 16,047
Because I don't have a desk (for keyboard and mouse) or a computer chair in front of my TV.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,870
Don't really need one, just get a wireless keyboard to login and sit on the sofa.
I mean, obviously I'm referring to playing games with a controller on said TV. I wouldn't expect people to play with K&M in front of a TV
I mean, obviously I'm referring to playing games with a controller on said TV. I wouldn't expect people to play with K&M in front of a TV
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 4,355
- Location
- In a world of my own - but it's ok, they know me.
I currently run my PC with 3x4k screens - mostly for work but also for games but as I’m stuck at 60Hz fps and lag are unusual issues. I do however have a 55” LG 4K smart tv in the office behind me which I use for Sky News while working. I must admit I am kinda tempted to plug it in and see how I get on with that on my desk instead of the other 3….