This has to be worse than the Jag own-goal surely?
This has to be worse than the Jag own-goal surely?
Well, going by this thread so far, most people are commenting on the looks not the drivetrain.the daft thing is nothing is stopping a proper low slung sporty EV. There are some.
However guaranteed the usual suspects with an agenda will blame it all on it being an EV rather than just not liking the design regardless of what is powering it.
I reminds me of something you would see in a racing videogame but one without a licence to use real cars.

I mean is Ives even that good if all he can do is replicate the original iPhone design? Surely top designers evolve over time?What a minger. I guess Ives and cars don't mix well.
I meant more the media rather than this thread but I can see why my post reads that way.Well, going by this thread so far, most people are commenting on the looks not the drivetrain.
It seems to be the tech bros (Ives in this case) that are doing more damage than the eco warriors. Although ultimately it was someone in Ferrari who signed it off.
They should give one to each of the current F1 drivers, for the lols![]()
After the Jag disaster I just can't begin to fathom why someone at Ferrari of all places would think this was a good idea.
Reading the reactions to this and looking at Ferrari's plummeting share price... Someone is getting whacked today.
This:
![]()
Reminds me of something and I can't put my finger on what. It's sort of like a side-smiling robot or something.
Don't you mean Braun designs (more accurately Dieter Rams).... Ives has been very good at converting an existing design philosophy into the Apple product stack when you have software that is then designed purely for that device.... is he really a top designer, I think that's the bigger question, the design language at apple hasn't changed much since he left so the rest of the team can clearly make minimalist boxes without him lol....I mean is Ives even that good if all he can do is replicate the original iPhone design? Surely top designers evolve over time?
I think people have this product slightly wrong honestly. Ferrari have said nothing about changes to other product lines. This is a completely new line. Ultimately they’ve been forced to produce it, but doesn’t replace anything ICE that they’re doing, and so why would it be designed to look like any of those things, and eat into that line. Liklihood is you still need to buy 3 Roma’s to have a chance of buying one, and you need a Luce to have a sniff of any special series cars which will continue to return huge sums over list.Easily nobody really cares about Jag anymore, Ferrari are far more iconic.
I can't even imagine owning a Ferrari and even if I could I probably wouldn't. Yet this still greatly upsets me, it's the emdownfall of beauty and the great era of cool cars.
It's the nail on the coffin really.
No more dad's drive cool cars anymore. It's all some **** suv or something that looks like everything else. Now millionaires aren't going to have cool cars soon :/
But this is the point. Why would you do that and eat into your core product set, the real Ferrari. You absolute preserve those and sidebar your EVs.The thing is you can make a car with most of the Luce's design elements, and still make it look like a Ferrari. The main issue seems to be the proportions:
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Luce already have 24" wheels, what do you think those things on that AI monstrosity are?The thing is you can make a car with most of the Luce's design elements, and still make it look like a Ferrari. The main issue seems to be the proportions:
![]()
![]()
![]()