Deleted member 66701
Deleted member 66701
No-one who’s likely to have something to leave to their to their family agrees with IHT.
I do. It (or tries to) prevent the concentration of wealth, which is a principle I wholeheartedly agree with.
No-one who’s likely to have something to leave to their to their family agrees with IHT.
I was rather under the impression that there was a limit on "gifts", both in terms of value (£3,000 pa) and timing (7 years)? Otherwise why would anyone's Estate ever be subject to Inheritance Tax?
Unfortunately, all this is just a question of curiosity![]()
Those two posts seem to make more sense. The 30% figure just seems to be a number plucked from the air, based on what the HMRC would (probably) not notice.
One further question - For what (type of) tax are you still liable (at the market value) in this (intra family undervalue) situation?
No, because you're effectively "gifting" the remaining 170k value of the house without paying the associated inheritance tax etc. It's a tax dodge and quite rightly dealt with as such my HMRC.
What would be the steps in doing this be? Legal things to look out for? expected taxes and ways of trying to reduce them legally? Official people to get involved and perhaps financial advisors?
So my mum couldn’t sell her £400k house to my brother for £230k? That’s just wrong. You should be able to sell your property to who you like, for what you like.
I believe capital gains would be HMRCs angle