Permabanned
Not sure anyone is really going to be too fussed if they get 205 FPS vs 220 FPS.
Still too early for this thread without more statistics/comparisons.
Still too early for this thread without more statistics/comparisons.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yes, with one garbage Asus mobo, a Prime X570-P.
While for the same price you might get better Z390 boards such as ASRock Z390 EXTREME4, Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE and Asus PRIME Z390-A.
What a silly thread.
I had a 9900k sold it...for what I paid...Got a refund on the Asus Hero costing £260
Then bought a MSI Gaming Carbon for £109
I'll be dropping in a 3900x...I'll have 9900k performance...4 more cores for less money....
Uuuuuh, anyone who doesn't have a RTX 2080 Ti doesn't care mate.and in games be slower. for the life time of the new amd processor.
it actually dumbfounds me that people have swallowed the amd hook. the benchmark slide for eg posted earlier. they used a 2080 gtx why ? because the framerates are closer to intel with that still slower than a 9900k ingames overall but close enough . add in a 2080ti then you see the gap grow with intel cpus. you will see this in benchmarks soon. you are basically paying for more cores. if you use those extra cores of 12+ its amazing for you. if you dont use more than 8 then you buying a slower product. makes no sense. pricing needs to change. i think it will once the hype dies down a little and the true benchmarks are out.
the funny thing is gaming elite benchmark slide even shows that the £400 8 core amd new cpu is slower in games than a current 9700k 8 core cpu which costs as little as £350 .
Uuuuuh, anyone who doesn't have a RTX 2080 Ti doesn't care mate.
I absolutely agree that their comparison was a bit odd - comparing a £350 i7-9700K to a £380 R7 3800X with the latter losing slightly in gaming (but far ahead in creation workloads). However, there are no goal posts, you're literally creating and planting them yourself. OK, maybe fifty people on the planet care about a few extra FPS while playing at 1080p with a 2080 Ti. No-one else does, so why keep bringing it up?the point is the intel cpu is cheaper and quicker in games at said resolution. having a 2080 ti is irrelevant. the only reason i mentioned it is because amd didnt show the benchmarks with that card in because it shows the gap is bigger. moving the goal posts.
You mean in 5+ years presumably. GPUs haven't become more affordable (for a given performance band) for, what, 3 years now?Except when in 2 years time the xx70 card is as fast as a 2080ti.....
Got to love AMD marketing, 1st gen ryzen was all about 4k/1440p now it's all about 1080p.
And we, myself including swallowed it all up.
the point is the intel cpu is cheaper and quicker in games at said resolution
I absolutely agree that their comparison was a bit odd - comparing a £350 i7-9700K to a £380 R7 3800X with the latter losing slightly in gaming (but far ahead in creation workloads). However, there are no goal posts, you're literally creating and planting them yourself. OK, maybe fifty people on the planet care about a few extra FPS while playing at 1080p with a 2080 Ti. No-one else does, so why keep bringing it up?
I absolutely agree that their comparison was a bit odd - comparing a £350 i7-9700K to a £380 R7 3800X with the latter losing slightly in gaming (but far ahead in creation workloads). However, there are no goal posts, you're literally creating and planting them yourself. OK, maybe fifty people on the planet care about a few extra FPS while playing at 1080p with a 2080 Ti. No-one else does, so why keep bringing it up?
You mean in 5+ years presumably. GPUs haven't become more affordable (for a given performance band) for, what, 3 years now?
Again, the twenty people with 1080p 240 Hz monitors who cannot do without those last 10 FPS appreciate you both posting in this type of thread (again).
Nope. Generally Intel is slower and more expensive.
RIP Intel.