Soldato
i use an oled, it looks great to me tooI use a 32" 1440p panel. DLSS Quality looks great to me.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
i use an oled, it looks great to me tooI use a 32" 1440p panel. DLSS Quality looks great to me.
i use an oled, it looks great to me too
It's Nvidia's excellent marketing! people buy brands not products...
dr dre beats anyone?Nah. People want the best in terms of performance and stability.
No doubt that Nvidia holds the performance crown, has the most mature drivers and has far less overall issues compared to AMD. Who wants to spend their freetime fixing BSOD, black screen or flickering issues?
The RX6000 series does seem a step in the right direction for AMD though, but I'd want to see 2-3 more years of continued stability before moving back to team red.
Nah. People want the best in terms of performance and stability.
No doubt that Nvidia holds the performance crown, has the most mature drivers and has far less overall issues compared to AMD. Who wants to spend their freetime fixing BSOD, black screen or flickering issues?
The RX6000 series does seem a step in the right direction for AMD though, but I'd want to see 2-3 more years of continued stability before moving back to team red.
Someone earlier in the thread quotes that the 6800XT is faster than a 3080!! Odd when a 3080 pulls the pants down on a 6900XT in some titles. @ 4k Nvidia is king even without DLSS.
Nvidia have been a bit more plug n play for a good long while.
Someone earlier in the thread quotes that the 6800XT is faster than a 3080!!
And he's not wrong.6800 XTs are faster than 3080s on the whole, unless you enable Ray Tracing.
Nah. People want the best in terms of performance and stability.
No doubt that Nvidia holds the performance crown, has the most mature drivers and has far less overall issues compared to AMD. Who wants to spend their freetime fixing BSOD, black screen or flickering issues?
The RX6000 series does seem a step in the right direction for AMD though, but I'd want to see 2-3 more years of continued stability before moving back to team red.
AMD had one series that caused actual (proven) issues to many users - 5700 series. I had it myself for a while and after 6 months or so finally sold it. I swapped to 3 different AIBs models (XFX, Sapphire and Gigabyte) and all of them were very unstable, black screens etc. Each of these runs just fine on many other machines, so no issues with cards or drivers there. Odd thing, especially that 290 before and now 6800 and 6800xt, along with 3060Ti and 2070S work with 0 issues on the same machine.
That said, aside that unfortunate one series, I had no serious issues with AMD nor NVIDIA drivers for a long time now, though I still remember youtube crashing madly on NVIDIA drivers (1070Ti card) if I had it opened in more than 1-2 tabs at once (even if only 1 tab was playing).
Meanwhile this never happened did it:
The latest GeForce driver is causing major issues for some users - here's how to fix them | TechRadar
Not sure which Digital Shilleries you have been reading, but the 6900XT and 3090 are a match
Those are the very highest end cards of each model
Looks at 4k results and stand by my statement.
I didn't say anything about a 3090. I was on about a 3080 @ 4k - keeps up and sometimes surpasses a 6900XT....like I said.
Not to mention when you add dlss into the mix.....
FSR is great with the 2 max settings at 4K but sadly, it's not getting into the games that 1. people care about 2. games where it is really needed (not amds fault though if said games are nvidia sponsored....) 3. it requires the base games AA/IQ to be very good otherwise it will just enhance poorly implemented AA artifacting/issues