So that would/should be a societal question.in the past machines led to better jobs though and ended jobs humans simply hated doing.
AI doesn;t really seem to be creating anything for the average person to take part in job wise.
at least with automation people had to make and maintain the machines and get all the metals.
there's no cottage industry with AI, no cafes needed, no pubs, no infrastructure at all other than electric and water
with AI it's probably about 10 staff on duty in a massive warehouse and all the hardware behind AI is pretty much automated production without human involvement.
people didn;t want to be in the fields with a scythe etc when a machine could do the work and they could work in a factory instead.
automation pretty much just changed where people mostly worked, AI is basically ending jobs with no replacement.
look how much staff all the tech companies are laying off they will mostly be jobs that just stop existing, not the normal cull to reduce wages
the whole thing is going to be extremely parasitical anyway since it's all American companies, it's basically digital colonisation and extraction of wealth.
the truth is no one really needs it, it only really benefits america and in the first decade or two it;s probably just going to lead to lower living standards as there's less money in the economy
Do we use AI as a tool to make things more efficient by sacrificing the human element?
Or
Do we use AI to work holistically with human workers without throwing the human labour onto the scrap heap?
I have read a few studies recently on how certain countries are incorporating new tech/AI into their countries. It does appear we in the West have made it way too expensive and very rentier extraction as is our line of capitalism.
For example, the installation of Data centres, great on paper, however once you dig a little, it is clear we just don't have the power infrastructure to power them without blackouts. Amazon recently got refused for a 300mil data centre in Ireland on this basis, the Irish government couldn't power it for lack of energy infrastructure.
Whereas China, went all out building power stations all over the place, then by hook or by crook has been producing Ai on the cheap that is tied into their infrastructure but is used in a way that assists rather then takes over. Chinese farmers using AI for efficiency as an example.
I do believe we have got it wrong in the West when it comes to AI, we want to build Monopolies around the tech but that will stifle it or again allow the Elite/Corporate to take it over. (Like everything over the last 40years)



