They can shove their subscriptions up their @%$. I will never rent a computer or computer parts. Unfortunately, we have a generation who will never know a time when you own your product, VHS, CD's and software that you buy. These tech bros and their media backers want to convince the younger generation it's the normal to rent everything.
I refuse to even have game subscription services from either Sony or Microsoft. Unfortunately it seems that physical media is fast becoming obsolete, On the Nintendo switch 2 when you buy games, the box does not have a physical game anymore but a game key-card. Its only a matter of time until they stop completely. Not all the games are like this but most are because Nintendo's pricing for cartridges to game developers/publishers. Over the next 10 years there might not be disks or cartridges anymore for home consoles.
off onterest to anyone
DIY DDR5.
www.tomshardware.com
it does make me think though, if you get failed DDR5 ram, keep hold of it, and sell it as faulty it'll sell if people are using this method as they'll try and salvage the good memory modules for transplant.
and
ASUS is rumored to enter the DRAM manufacturing segment by 2026, which should ensure a stable memory supply for its PC lineups.
wccftech.com
this news is confusing???
Building a dedicated fab takes about 3-4 years and ASUS cant just pick and mix how much production they need from a facility, usually small/medium sized facility would have a baseline production capacity at minimum and I assume that alone would overshoot ASUS needs, which is good thing. The clean rooms would take roughly 2 years to produce and 1 years for calibrating machines and 1 year for production runs and yield optimisations. Also you cant just switch lines form DDR5 to GDDR7 like you are throwing a swich, normally this involves recalibrating machines for production runs and whether they use EUV or DUV for the GDDR7.
a medium sized facility would cost about 5-10 billion depending on the number of lines and EUV/DUV machines. depending on if they want to produce DDR6 where they need EUV machines. Where is ASUS going to get this money from? They would want this facility built for more modern DDR6 as its possible DDR5 demand might taper off. The problem is that although they can produce DDR6 using DUV machines using Multi-Patterning techniques, from what I understand they are inefficient and not economically viable to due resources required, ie multiple pass, chemicals, ect. BUT having said that EUV machines have a long lead time from ASML, apparently up to 3 years. That would delay production by possibly that amount of time, which would mean production starts in 2032 or there abouts. Also producing DDR6 using EUV is costly and would need volume production to be viable and expensive to set up lines, they would need large production run to achieve economics of scale. They could use a hybrid approach of EUV for some layers and DUV for others.
Regardless of what they want they are most likely going to get DUV machines and most likely from lines being retired from somewhere as ordering new from Nikon or ASML has two year lead time or possibly more for DUV machines.
Samsung, intel and micron are retiring some of they older equipment and moving onto HBM so there will definitely be possible to setup a fab FAST-ER by buying a current retiring line, so this might be the most realistic possibility.
assuming a small to medium sized facility, this would overshoot what ASUS would need by multiple factors. You cant just produce what ASUS needs, that would not be economically viable and push prices up per wafer. Asus would definitely need to overproduce to sell to others but the problem is the timeline. I hear many saying this ram crunch will last till 2028, if so what is the point of all this? ASUS is a small company the investment required for a line is going to be very high and the risk of future demand for DDR5 cold be unpredictable and volatile. This is risky strategy and to be honest if I was ASUS financial adviser, I would not be willing to take this risk unless there are multiple investors willing to share the risk.
what makes more sense is given the above, they are probably investing in a foundry-lite model or investing in another company like nanya or PSMC to build a line and they secure the output. I really doubt ASUS is going to be primary manufacturer like Samsung.
sorry for wall of text, just wanted to provide some context on why I don't believe the story or the way its written or implied.