Does anyone in here have a i9 14900k and a rtx 4090 and plays bf6?
- Thread starter seanuk
- Start date
Normally if it has suffered degradation the initial symptoms are failing when compiling shaders or corruption in unzipping data i.e. when installing an application or when encoding/decoding media files, performance degradation isn't normally a symptom. As it progresses you will start to get random BSODs, especially when trying to boot, related to specific memory operations.
Probably better posting in the CPU forum, here we just call each other names and throw poo through each other's letterboxes.
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2021
- Posts
- 4,919
- Location
- Oxon
Look up bf6 performance fix minnidot on YouTube. Turn on performance stats in bf6 settings so you can see graphs of per core usage. Then apply the fix and see the difference.
To be fair, it is Christmas, we've all eaten way too much and the end product needs to go somewhere.
A whole new meaning to Secret SantaTo be fair, it is Christmas, we've all eaten way too much and the end product needs to go somewhere.
A whole new meaning to Secret Santa
The secret certainly starts with an S, I'm not sure about Santa.
Picturing brown robes and a new horrifying entity akin to Krampus, spawned into being by the collective minds of the OCUK community.
Cheers pal il check it out was mostly looking for a ball park figure as to what people sort of get with similar specs
You still worrying about this Sean? Last few times you have posted about this your FPS looks fine for your rig!
Yer buddy seen a lot lower spec pcs like 4070ti pulling more fps on low settings?
Sell full rig get a x3d and a 5090 be alright then
Would mate but already spent a fortune on my rig and to be onest from what I’ve seen majority of and builds get worse 1 percent lows? What’s your setup @rchads89 ? Thanks for help also buddy
9800x3d 5090 Asus astral overclocked 9800X3D on pbo and core clock stock voltages left the 5090 stock. Debloated windows can get over 400fps at times but mainly around 300 just over depending on map on 1440p.
So you think 200-220 is good for mine on low?
Id say so yeah its not struggling at that is it lets be honest
Cheers buddy do you do the customer user config file on your setup?
Yeah I have done that FR33THY custom config did the same for arc raiders tbh I wouldn't say i gained much on either game from his configs but tried them anyway..
It's pretty turned down as I favour trying to get 165 FPS (to match my monitor) but looks pretty good for me.
- texture quality - low
- texture filtering - overkill
- mesh quality - medium
- terrain quality - medium
- undergrowth quality - high
- effects quality - low
- volumetric quality - low
- lighting quality - high
- local light & shadow quality - high
- sun shadow quality - low
- shadow filtering - PCSS
- reflection quality - high
- screen space reflections - off
- post process quality - high
- screen space AO & GI - off
- high fidelity objects amount - high
- Nvidia low latency enabled
- DLSS performance mode
I run a 1400p monitor and what really helped was reducing the fixed resolution scale to 80% (graphics > advanced). This lets my GPU render at a lower res then scale up, it looks fine to me still.