The budget

Permabanned
Joined
13 Jan 2005
Posts
10,708
dirtydog said:
Why should fuel duty be subject to inflationary tax increases? :confused:

We don't increase VAT or other taxes each year with inflation; the rate stays the same.

Isnt it obvious?

VAT is expressed as a %age of the purchase price - as prices rices, so does the tax take - its inherently index linked.

Fuel duty is expressed in pennies per litre - if the cost of fuel doubles the effective tax rate halves. Thats why the duty has to be adjusted to changing prices.
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Jan 2005
Posts
10,708
Admiral Huddy said:
Rotty - Has he not scrapped the lower 10% tax band.. If that's the case were all going to a lot worse off.. despite the fall of the 22% to 20%?

No, because the 10% band is tiny in comparison to the 20/22% band.
 
Don
OP
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
41,752
Location
Notts
Admiral Huddy said:
Rotty - Has he not scrapped the lower 10% tax band.. If that's the case were all going to a lot worse off.. despite the fall of the 22% to 20%?


the 10% band is a very narrow one ( marginally above £2000 ) so most folks ( not all ) will recoup more than this loss when the 2% drop in the main rate is factored in
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Feb 2003
Posts
29,640
Location
Chelmsford
Rotty said:
the 10% band is a very narrow one ( marginally above £2000 ) so most folks ( not all ) will recoup more than this loss when the 2% drop in the main rate is factored in

It's all smoke and mirrors.. He's increased the NI threshold to that we'll be paying more NI on out earnings.
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
Visage said:
Isnt it obvious?

VAT is expressed as a %age of the purchase price - as prices rices, so does the tax take - its inherently index linked.

Fuel duty is expressed in pennies per litre - if the cost of fuel doubles the effective tax rate halves. Thats why the duty has to be adjusted to changing prices.
:) fair enough. I'm not sure why it isn't just a fixed percentage though.
 
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2003
Posts
40,104
Location
FR+UK
dirtydog said:
Why should fuel duty be subject to inflationary tax increases? :confused:
It could have been another superfluous "green vote" winner.

Rotty said:
the NI threshold increase only affects people on over £33k
Great, so people that earn over £33k can get screwed and pay even more taxes? :rolleyes:
 
Don
OP
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
41,752
Location
Notts
platypus said:
It could have been another superfluous "green vote" winner.

Great, so people that earn over £33k can get screwed and pay even more taxes? :rolleyes:

this I don't undertand , folks are quoting that people on over £38k will be worse off but I can;t see how as surely the increase in the 40% threshold more than offsets this
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Feb 2003
Posts
29,640
Location
Chelmsford
He's increased NI to net the difference of incresing the tax treshold. Yet again, a change that effects the higher tax payer.. robbing those that have worked hard to get were they.

It all looks good but the net figures mean nothing.. It just a smoke screen.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
11 Dec 2002
Posts
10,815
Location
Darkest Norfolk
Asset sales will rise from £18bn to £36bn, with the sale of spectrum, a £6bn sale of the student loan book, and further financial and corporate sales at home and overseas.

what exactly does this mean? they are selling off the student loan rights to a private company? If so i'm pretty damn sure this CANNOT be a good thing :(

The lack of realistic help on the houseing market is farsical tbh - the "free" stamp duty is only going to benafit the rich who can aford to buy new "carbon free" homes. There is no help for first time buyers, such as an increase in the stamp duty base rate, or an increase in the second home duty to reduce buy to let :(
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Feb 2003
Posts
29,640
Location
Chelmsford
Rotty said:
this I don't undertand , folks are quoting that people on over £38k will be worse off but I can;t see how as surely the increase in the 40% threshold more than offsets this

because he's effectively transferred the 10% tax which had a ceiling to NI which doesn't.. the net effect is the more you earn the worse off you'll be. Fine if you are behind the normal rate tax limit. Exceed it and he claws more cash back from the higher rate earners..
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Jan 2005
Posts
10,708
Siliconslave said:
what exactly does this mean? they are selling off the student loan rights to a private company? If so i'm pretty damn sure this CANNOT be a good thing :(

I wont have an effect on students who owe money - those loans were under a fixed agreement that cannot be altered. Whoever buys the debt can hardly turn around and say 'Actually we're doubling the interest rate'.
 
Don
OP
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
41,752
Location
Notts
Admiral Huddy said:
because he's effectively transferred the 10% tax which had a ceiling to NI which doesn't.. the net effect is the more you earn the worse off you'll be. Fine if you are behind the normal rate tax limit. Exceed it and he claws more cash back from the higher rate earners..


the NI ceiling has only increased ( about the same as the 40% tax threshold ) it hasn't been abolished
 
Back
Top Bottom