Ugh, how come everyone else with my GPU scores like ~1k
The integrated graphics would be more like 100 not 800.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***Official Unigine Heaven 2.5 Benchmark Scores***
- Thread starter w3bbo
- Start date
- Status
The integrated graphics would be more like 100 not 800.
Soldato
Ugh, how come everyone else with my GPU scores like ~1k
Because yours in the 560 non-Ti model I'd guess, which has less shaders, etc.. than a 560 Ti.
The 560 non-Ti is basically a GTX460 in disguise.
Sounds like the issue I've just started having (mines 5970+GT440 thu) on a new driver install where another GPU is named by Heaven (GT440) but your main GPU is being used.
I wouldn't worry about what Heaven says but make sure you post what GPU it did run on.
elrasho; your scores are pretty good there for a couple 5850s. I'd run it a couple of times to get your Min up as it should be above mine.
How does running it again increase the minimum FPS? Yeah I'm quite pleased with that score although my fans are much louder now. Trixxx shows temp at 65C under load.
Soldato
Last edited:
Soldato
Dave I love the dedication to the cause, portable AC... awesome!
Well My best run I recorded at 5760x1080 was... below (although did have a run of 99.9fps maximum, never reached 100 on a 950/5900, however cores just won't take it at that 24/7, so have to run 925 cores.)
Well My best run I recorded at 5760x1080 was... below (although did have a run of 99.9fps maximum, never reached 100 on a 950/5900, however cores just won't take it at that 24/7, so have to run 925 cores.)
Last edited:
Soldato
Means I can run the fan on the card slower so it doesn't sap voltage away from the core, also disabled pretty much everything else on the PC. No artifacting either, so reckon I could go higher
These cards go insanely high (not mine)What does yours score on 1680x1050 res?
Soldato
It won't run mate, tried it... comes up with a DX error setting the resolution, mustn't be supported by these monitors I've got... can run obviously 1 screen at 1920x1080, not sure what scores though... probably not as high as you think, as this rig is more for eyefinity really... doubt the GPU's would be used well at 1920x1080... not sure, will run later, see what it does.Means I can run the fan on the card slower so it doesn't sap voltage away from the core, also disabled pretty much everything else on the PC. No artifacting either, so reckon I could go higher
What does yours score on 1680x1050 res?
EDIT: If only BF3 scaled as well as Heaven does, which uses 98% of each core when benching, BF3 is CPU limited bigtime never going above 55% tops on each GPU core... such a waste of power really this Q6600 is showing it's age now!
Last edited:
Very late now so I hope this makes sense...
You could have had a spike of system activity that required system resources which dropped your Mins and/or Heaven's framerate fluctuates which does happen in other benchmarks. If you want, take a screenshot after each successive run to note the differences for your own curiosity.
It's been said here before that running it 2, ideally 3 times helps as it ensures uniform results. Normally you'd take the second or third screenshot for proof as the initial run was simply a warmup. Any anomalies should be ironed out because of the multiple runs.
Your GPU seems to have a good temp under load but I'd make sure your GPU fans are cranked up to around 80% for longer benches and stick the aircon on/window open (my house is fully insulated and the heat doesn't escape too well - benchmarking in Summer makes my office a sauna!)
Associate
I want to see some 7900 series scores in here, for example;
7970 -
7970 - overclocked
7950 -
7950 - overclocked
Would be interesting where they sit on the board.
Anyone know when it gets updated too?
7970 -
7970 - overclocked
7950 -
7950 - overclocked
Would be interesting where they sit on the board.
Anyone know when it gets updated too?
Rig- i7 920 4gig, 12 gig ram XFX ATI Radeon HD 7970 Black Edition 3072MB £460 model not DD model. Driver ver 8.921
GPU 1000 Mhz MEM 1425Mhz temp 70 degree
Overclocked by CCC only no voltage mod moved sliders to max
GPU 1125 Mhz MEM 1575 Mhz temp 80 degree
Cannot hear Gpu fans over the nosie of the fans in Antec 1200 case.
Lets not forget we are on driver release 1 from AMD more to come for sure. Upgraded from tri 5970-5890 difference in game is three fold mainly because of extra vram.
In game BF3 2560x1440 all ultra AA 4x never drops below 60 fps
Last edited:
Soldato
New Beta drivers, 295.51. Improved my old score! Fastest single GTX470. 
Soldato
New Beta drivers, 295.51. Improved my old score! Fastest single GTX470.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but Deception's 470 beats your score :
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=21067845&postcount=1512
Soldato
Soldato
Associate
Only bought my second gtx 460 1gb this month.(the other is like 16 months old)
It might be getting to "old tech" but for £110-120 brand new what can beat the bang for buck?especially if you already had one.
Could probly say the same for..whats closest? a 6850?
7970 is probly the only single gpu card you could definitely say is better than dual cards of those.(right now anyway)
It might be getting to "old tech" but for £110-120 brand new what can beat the bang for buck?especially if you already had one.
Could probly say the same for..whats closest? a 6850?
7970 is probly the only single gpu card you could definitely say is better than dual cards of those.(right now anyway
)
Last edited:
- Status