Soldato
Very nice score TB, Now I'm going to disable ULPS and max out the cards and CPU should get 1280/1850 from these if I remember.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Soldato
Cheers
MSIAB loads with Windows start up and I just run the bench mate
I do have trouble with rendering when trying to run full screen with all three monitors running and have to disable 2 through CCC
Hope you get sorted
Soldato
Cheers mate - I can't compete with those on air - in pretty sure that run was as fat as they will go without getting wet
Go for it and give em some stick
Which means you should be looking for another reason why you get lower score than me
My score is completely legit and it was accepted at Overclock.net where there is a guy who beats us all @ 1305Mhz / 1875Mhz
Caporegime
Which means you should be looking for another reason why you get lower score than me
My score is completely legit and it was accepted at Overclock.net where there is a guy who beats us all @ 1305Mhz / 1875Mhz
CCC tweaks.
Soldato
Which means you should be looking for another reason why you get lower score than me
My score is completely legit and it was accepted at Overclock.net where there is a guy who beats us all @ 1305Mhz / 1875Mhz
complete bs, that means the top 5 should all be looking at their own scores then - against your 4.2ghz 950.
Man of Honour
Squeezed out a few more on mine
GTX 690 x 2 @1076/1825/1170
3960X @5.0
I don't think the drivers for quad sli are that good on this, the GPUs are not getting that warm.
GTX 690 x 2 @1076/1825/1170
3960X @5.0
I don't think the drivers for quad sli are that good on this, the GPUs are not getting that warm.
Soldato
Sorry lads
CPU 3930k @ 4.9ghz
GPU 3x 7970 @ GPU 1280mhz & MEM 1900mhz
I even tripped my PSU out doing this (coolermaster 1250w)
CPU 3930k @ 4.9ghz
GPU 3x 7970 @ GPU 1280mhz & MEM 1900mhz
I even tripped my PSU out doing this (coolermaster 1250w)
Man of Honour
Very nice Locky, its going to take a Titanic effort to beat that.
Soldato
Very nice Locky, its going to take a Titanic effort to beat that.
hehe I'm sure greg will be along to rape us all and 8pack when he gets them.
I have never seen my cards at 50c before, so they was working hard. But it is 23c in this room even with the window open (top floor)
Man of Honour
Soldato
Anyone who wants to beat your score are going to need at least 3 Titans.
Well 8 pack is acquiring 3 titans
Ive just thought, crossfire pretty much is 100% scaling in this bench (well the xfire profile I use)
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Well 8 pack is acquiring 3 titans
I think he might be in for a surprise on this bench, if you look at my temps on this they are very low probably where the drivers are not pushing the GPUs. Its going to be just as bad if not worse for 8 Pack using Titans.
My temps on other benches normally get into the 80s
Soldato
Sorry lads
CPU 3930k @ 4.9ghz
GPU 3x 7970 @ GPU 1280mhz & MEM 1900mhz
I even tripped my PSU out doing this (coolermaster 1250w)
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!
Haxxx i tell yer
lol, stonking score mate - top effort indeed
Man of Honour
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!
Haxxx i tell yer
lol, stonking score mate - top effort indeed
+1
It is
6004 means very good scaling on the GPUs
Soldato
Don't hate because you got beaten, but try to top my score
that's easy, go into CCC and mess with the tessellation and level of detail like you and the rest on that overclock forum
we're not stupid we know all the tricks too.
Caporegime
Don't hate because you got beaten, but try to top my score
How can we beat a score that will never get on the scoreboard?
So anyone that beats your top scores is automatically branded cheater?that's easy, go into CCC and mess with the tessellation and level of detail like you and the rest on that overclock forum
we're not stupid we know all the tricks too.
Is that your only argument, because I can't see one that makes sense?
What is your proof that my score is invalid? The assumption that it must be, because it's higher than yours?How can we beat a score that will never get on the scoreboard?